ASHOK KUMAR vs THE DIRECTOR , BANARSIDAS CHANDIWALA INSTITUTE OF PROFESSIONAL STUDIES & ANR

Judgment text excerpt

$~8 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision: 15.04.2025 + LPA 136/2020 ASHOK KUMAR .....Appellant Through: Mr. Raj Kamal, Mr. Aseem Atwal, Ms. Muskan Sidana, Ms. Aprajita Tyagi, Mr. Ishaan Ojha, Advs. versus THE DIRECTOR , BANARSIDAS CHANDIWALA INSTITUTE OF PROFESSIONAL STUDIES & ANR .....Respondents Through: Mr. Anuj Malhotra, Adv. for R1. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAVIN CHAWLA HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE RENU BHATNAGAR NAVIN CHAWLA, J. (Oral) 1. This appeal has been filed, challenging the Order dated 06.01.2020 passed by the learned Single Judge of this Court in W.P.(C) 9434/2016, titled Ashok Kumar v. The Director, Banarasidas Chandiwala Institute of Professional Studies & Anr., dismissing the writ petition filed by the appellant herein, however, reserving the liberty to the appellant to assail his termination before appropriate Court/forum. 2. The appellant had filed the above writ petition alleging therein that he had been appointed as the Personal Assistant to the respondent No. 1, the Director, Banarasidas Chandiwala Institute of Professional Signature Not Verified Signed By:VIJAYA LPA 136/2020 Page 1 of 5 LAKSHMI DOBHAL Signing Date:23.04.2025 15:14:10 Studies, vide letter dated 07.12.2010. The said appointment letter stated that the appellant shall be on probation for a period of one year which could be extended further, and his services could be terminated at any time during the period of probation. 3. The appellant states that vide the letter dated 23.11.2011, issued by the respondent No. 1, the services of the appellant were confirmed to the said post. The appellant, however, was unceremoniously terminated from service vide order dated 05.11.2015 passed by respondent No. 2, Admin Cum Account Officer. 4. The appellant approached this Court by way