Logo
niyam.ai BETA

Vidya Bhargava Vs. Shekhar Bhargava & Ors. [2008] INSC 1051 (7 July 2008) 2008 Latest Caselaw 554 SC

Judges: R.V. RAVEENDRAN

Full Judgement

Vidya Bhargava Vs. Shekhar Bhargava & Ors. [2008] INSC 1051 (7 July 2008) Judgment CIVIL ORIGINAL JURISDICTION TRANSFER PETITION(C) NO. 799 OF 2007 Versus ORDER The first respondent herein, who is the son of Late Kanhiyalal Bhargava, has filed a petition for probate in regard to the Will allegedly left by said Kanhiyalal Bhargava in the High Court of Madhya Pradesh, Indore Bench. According to him, he and the petitioner herein are the co-executors of the Will. The petitioner has filed this petition for transfer of the said probate proceedings from the High Court of Madhya Pradesh to High Court of Delhi. It is not disputed that considerable properties of Kanhiyalal Bhargava are situated at Indore. It is also not disputed that the said Will was executed at Indore and the attesting witnesses are from Indore. In fact, it is not the case of the petitioner that Kanhiyalal Bhargava did not execute the said Will. However, according to the petitioner, Kanhiyalal Bhargava executed a subsequent Will in favour of a Public Trust and that Public Trust has also filed a petition for probate. But we are not concerned with the said proceedings. Having regard to the nature of the proceedings that are pending in the High Court of Madhya Pradesh and the nature of contest by petitioner, this is not a fit case for transfer from Indore to Delhi. The petition is dismissed. .........................J. ( R.V. RAVEENDRAN ) New Delhi; .........................J.  

Similar Judgements

Alagammal and Ors. Vs. Ganesan and Anr. 2024 Latest Caselaw 29 SC

Alagammal and Ors. Vs. Ganesan and Anr. [Civil Appeal No. 8185 of 2009] A1: Alagammal A2: Palaniammal A3: Mariammal A4: Pattayee Ammal A5: Karupparaj A6: Lakshmi A7: Thangam A8: Maruthambal R1: Gan...

View Details

Sheikh Arif Vs. State of Maharashtra & Anr. 2024 Latest Caselaw 60 SC

Sheikh Arif Vs. State of Maharashtra & Anr. [Criminal Appeal No. 1368 of 2023] Abhay S. Oka, J. 1) A First Information Report (the impugned FIR) was registered against the appellant at the instance...

View Details

Kumar @ Shiva Kumar Vs. State of Karnataka 2024 Latest Caselaw 127 SC

Kumar @ Shiva Kumar Vs. State of Karnataka [Criminal Appeal No. 1427 of 2011] Ujjal Bhuyan, J. 1. This appeal by special leave takes exception to the conviction of the appellant under Section 306 o...

View Details

Arif Azim Co. Ltd. Vs. Aptech Ltd. 2024 Latest Caselaw 128 SC

Arif Azim Co. Ltd. Vs. Aptech Ltd. [Arbitration Petition No. 29 of 2023] J. B. Pardiwala, J.: For the convenience of exposition, this judgment is divided into the following parts:- INDEX A. FACTU...

View Details

Arif Azim Co. Ltd. Vs. Aptech Ltd. 2024 Latest Caselaw 129 SC

Arif Azim Co. Ltd. Vs. Aptech Ltd. [Arbitration Petition No. 29 of 2023] J. B. Pardiwala, J.: For the convenience of exposition, this judgment is divided into the following parts:- INDEX A. FACTU...

View Details

Srinivas Raghavendrarao Desai (D) by LRS. Vs. V. Kumar Vamanrao @ Alok and Ors. 2024 Latest Caselaw 134 SC

Srinivas Raghavendrarao Desai (D) by LRS. Vs. V. Kumar Vamanrao @ Alok and Ors. [Civil Appeal No(s). 7293-7294 of 2010] Rajesh Bindal, J. 1. The appeals1 filed by the plaintiffs having been partly ...

View Details