Logo
niyam.ai

Vicky Cashier @ Shamsher Singh vs State (Govt. Of Nct Of Delhi) & Anr. 2019 Latest Caselaw 1878 Del

Judges:

Full Judgement

Delhi High Court Vicky Cashier @ Shamsher Singh vs State (Govt. Of Nct Of Delhi) & Anr. on 4 April, 2019 $~5 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Judgment delivered on: 04.04.2019 + BAIL APPLN. 642/2019 VICKY CASHIER @ SHAMSHER SINGH ..... Petitioner versus STATE (GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI) & ANR ..... Respondents Advocates who appeared in this case: For the Petitioner : Mr. Deepak Kumar Adv. For the Respondent : Ms. Meenakshi Dahiya, Addl. PP for the State with SI Reena, P.S.Pachim Vihar. CORAM:- HON'BLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA JUDGMENT SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J. (ORAL) 1. Petitioner seeks regular bail in FIR No. 433/2018, under Section U/S 324/354/506/34 IPC P.S. Paschim Vihar. 2. Allegations of the prosecutrix is that she resides in a jhuggi along with her child and on the date of the incident the co accused Pappu Saansi along with three other boys came on the spot and started teasing and abusing her. It is alleged that the co accused slapped her and when her daughter intervened, he assaulted her with a sharp instrument. BAIL APPLN. 642/2019 Page 1 of 2 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner has been falsely implicated. He submits that there are no allegations against the petitioner of either slapping or assaulting either the complainant or her daughter. Learned counsel further submits that the petitioner was not even on the spot. He submits that petitioner has been in custody since 15.12.2018. 4. Without commenting on the merits of the case and keeping in view the totality of the facts and circumstances of the case, I am satisfied that the petitioner has made out a case for grant of regular bail. 5. Accordingly, on petitioner furnishing a bail bond in the sum of Rs. 10,000/- with one surety of the like amount to the satisfaction of the Trial Court, petitioner shall be released on bail, if not required in any other case. Petitioner shall not do anything which may prejudice either the trial or the prosecution witnesses. 6. Petition is allowed in the above terms. 7. Order Dasti under signatures of the Court Master. APRIL 04, 2019 SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J rk BAIL APPLN. 642/2019 Page 2 of 2

Similar Judgements

Gurwinder Singh Vs. State of Punjab & Anr. 2024 Latest Caselaw 77 SC

Gurwinder Singh Vs. State of Punjab & Anr. [Criminal Appeal No. 704 of 2024 @ SLP (Criminal) No. 10047 of 2023] Aravind Kumar J. 1. Leave granted. 2. The present appeal impugns the order dated 24....

View Details

Gurwinder Singh Vs. State of Punjab & Anr. 2024 Latest Caselaw 79 SC

Gurwinder Singh Vs. State of Punjab & Anr. [Criminal Appeal No. 704 of 2024 @ SLP (Criminal) No. 10047 of 2023] Aravind Kumar J. 1. Leave granted. 2. The present appeal impugns the order dated 24....

View Details

ITC Ltd. Vs. Aashna Roy 2023 Latest Caselaw 81 SC

ITC Ltd. Vs. Aashna Roy [Civil Appeal No. 6391 of 2021] Vikram Nath, J. 1. This appeal under Section 23 of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986 assails the correctness of the order dated 21st Septembe...

View Details

Munshi Vs. State of Uttar Pradesh 2023 Latest Caselaw 249 SC

Munshi Vs. State of Uttar Pradesh [Criminal Appeal No. 911/2023 @ SLP No. 4639 of 2018] Rajesh Bindal, J. 1. The present appeal was filed by three convicts namely Kamlesh Singh, Vishwaraj Singh and...

View Details

PURSHOTTAM CHOPRA vs. STATE(GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI) 2020 Latest Caselaw 8 SC

Before :- A.M. Khanwilkar and Dinesh Maheshwari, JJ. Criminal Appeal Nos. 194-195 of 2012. D/d. 7.1.2020. Purshottam Chopra & Anr. - Appellants Versus State (Govt. of NCT Delhi) - Respondents For...

View Details

Gurpreet Singh Vs. State of Punjab [2005] Insc 633 (9 November 2005) 2005 Latest Caselaw 630 SC

Gurpreet Singh Vs. State of Punjab [2005] Insc 633 (9 November 2005) B.N.Agrawal & A.K.Mathur with Criminal Appeal No. 710 Of 1995 Mohinder Pal Singh Appellant Versus State of Punjab Respondent B.N.A...

View Details