Logo
niyam.ai

Sushila Vel vs Airport Authority Of India & Anr. 2024 Latest Caselaw 2190 Del

Judges:

Full Judgement

Delhi High Court Sushila Vel vs Airport Authority Of India & Anr. on 14 March, 2024 Author: Tushar Rao Gedela Bench: Tushar Rao Gedela $~69 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Judgment delivered on: 14.03.2024 + W.P.(C) 3801/2024 SUSHILA VEL ..... Petitioner versus AIRPORT AUTHORITY OF INDIA & ANR. ..... Respondents Advocates who appeared in this case: For the Petitioner : Mr. Pranaynath Jha and Mr. Pratap Singh Rawat, Advocates. For the Respondents : Mr. Digvijay Rai and Mr. Archit Mishra, Advocates for R-1 with Mr. Yatinder Chaudhary, Law Officer (AAI). Ms. Anjana Gosain and Mr. Nippun Sharma, Advocates for R-2. Mr. Mahamaya Chatterjee, Govt pleader for UOI with Mr. Aayush Agrawal, Advocate. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE TUSHAR RAO GEDELA JUDGMENT TUSHAR RAO GEDELA, J. (ORAL) [ The proceeding has been conducted through Hybrid mode ] CM APPL. 15603/2024 (for exemption) 1. Exemption is allowed, subject to all just exceptions. 2. The application stands disposed of. Signature Not Verified Digitally Signed By:MADHU SARDANA W.P.(C) 3801/2024 Page 1 of 3 Signing Date:20.03.2024 15:46:21 W.P.(C) 3801/2024 & CM APPL. 15604/2024 (Explanation of maintainability of writ petition) 3. This is a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, 1950, seeking inter alia the following reliefs:- "a) Writ of Certiorari and/or any other Writ, Order or Direction, thereby quashing the decision conveyed vide impugned letter dated 11.01.2023 bearing ref. no. A.60011/15/2022-ES-1/54 issued by the Respondent No.1 and consequently direct the Respondent No.1 to remove the Petitioner's pay anomaly and fix her basic pay taking into account her seniority which is more than Smt. Sulekha Sethi; b) Directions to Respondent No.1 to process the representation made by the Petitioner vide its various letters regarding the issue of anomaly and expeditiously resolve the anomaly, thereby increasing the basic pay of the Petitioner in accordance with law in a time bound manner with consequential and pensionary benefits; c) Directions to Respondent No.1 to relook into the seniority list of Manager (PS) dated 01.09.2022 by taking into account the seniority of the Petitioner and redraw the same by placing her higher than Smt. Sulekha Sethi, who is junior to the Petitioner; d) Pass such other or further order(s) as this Hon'ble Court may deem fit and proper in the facts and circumstances of the case and in the interest of justice." 4. Issue Notice. 5. Notice is accepted by Mr. Digvijay Rai, learned counsel appearing for respondent No.1 and by Ms. Anjana Gosain, learned counsel appearing for respondent No.2. 6. Mr. Rai, learned counsel appearing for respondent No.1 submits by referring to the impugned order dated 11.01.2023 that the present petition may be directed to be treated as a representation, which the Competent Authority would consider and dispose of the same in accordance with law. Signature Not Verified Digitally Signed By:MADHU SARDANA W.P.(C) 3801/2024 Page 2 of 3 Signing Date:20.03.2024 15:46:21 7. Upon such submissions of Mr. Rai, learned counsel for the respondent, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner also has no objection to the same. 8. In view of the above, the present writ petition be treated as a representation by the respondent No.1 which the Competent Authority may consider and dispose of the same within a period of six weeks from today, after affording an opportunity of hearing to the petitioner and pass a speaking order. 9. The date, time and venue shall be informed to the petitioner, well in advance by the office of the Competent Authority. 10. Needless to state that the petitioner would be at liberty to take recourse to his remedies in accordance with law, upon being furnished with the copy of the order, which would be passed by the Competent Authority. 11. In view of the above, the present petition along with pending application is disposed of. TUSHAR RAO GEDELA, J. MARCH 14, 2024/nd Signature Not Verified Digitally Signed By:MADHU SARDANA W.P.(C) 3801/2024 Page 3 of 3 Signing Date:20.03.2024 15:46:21

Similar Judgements

Krishan Vs. State of Haryana 2024 Latest Caselaw 52 SC

Krishan Vs. State of Haryana [Criminal Appeal No. 2351 of 2011] Abhay S. Oka, J. Factual Aspects 1. The appellant is accused no.2, who, along with accused no.1 - Mahesh, was convicted for the offe...

View Details

Sudhir Vilas Kalel & Ors. Vs. Bapu Rajaram Kalel & Ors. 2024 Latest Caselaw 78 SC

Sudhir Vilas Kalel & Ors. Vs. Bapu Rajaram Kalel & Ors. [Civil Appeal No. 1776 of 2024 @ SLP (C) No. 23017 of 2023] K.V. Viswanathan, J. 1. Leave Granted. 2. The 'war' in this case is over the val...

View Details

Satyendar Kumar Jain Vs. Directorate of Enforcement 2024 Latest Caselaw 172 SC

Satyendar Kumar Jain Vs. Directorate of Enforcement [Criminal Appeal No. 1638 of 2024 @ SLP (Crl.) No. 6561 of 2023] Ankush Jain Vs. Directorate of Enforcement [Criminal Appeal No. 1639 of 2024 @ S...

View Details

Maha kali Sujatha Vs. The Branch Manager, Future Generali India Life Insurance Company Ltd. & Anr. 2024 Latest Caselaw 238 SC

Maha kali Sujatha Vs. The Branch Manager, Future Generali India Life Insurance Company Ltd. & Anr. [Civil Appeal No. 3821 of 2024] Nagarathna, J. 1. The present civil appeal has been filed by the c...

View Details

State of Arunachal Pradesh Vs. Kamal Agarwal & Ors. Etc. 2024 Latest Caselaw 252 SC

State of Arunachal Pradesh Vs. Kamal Agarwal & Ors. Etc. [Criminal Appeal Nos.________ of 2024 arising out of SLP (Crl.) Nos.8663-8665 of 2023] Chandra Mohan Badaya Vs. State of Arunachal Pradesh & ...

View Details

State of Haryana Vs. Sushila 2023 Latest Caselaw 22 SC

State of Haryana & Ors. Vs. Sushila & Ors. [Civil Appeal No. 9205 of 2022 @ SLP (C) No. 23446 of 2022 @ Diary No. 29159 of 2021] M.R. Shah, J. 1. Feeling aggrieved and dissatisfied with the impugne...

View Details