Logo
niyam.ai BETA

Sarthak Sachdeva, vs Karishma Chadha, 2023 Latest Caselaw 300 Del

Judges:

Full Judgement

Delhi High Court Sarthak Sachdeva, vs Karishma Chadha, on 23 January, 2023 Neutral Citation Number : 2023/DHC/000536 $~184 & 185 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Judgment delivered on: 23.01.2023 + MAT. APP. (F.C.) 120/2020 & CM. APPLS. 25872/2020. 316/2021 SARTHAK SACHDEVA ..... Appellant Versus KARISHMA CHADHA ...Respondent + MAT. APP. (F.C.) 148/2020 & CM. APPL. 19924/2021 KARISHMA CHADHA ..... Appellant Versus SARTHAK SACHDEVA ...Respondent Advocates who appeared in this case: For the Appellant: Mr. Rajat Aneja, Advocate with appellant in person. For the Respondent: Mr. Prabhjit Jauhar, Advocate with respondent in person. CORAM:- HON'BLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIKAS MAHAJAN JUDGMENT SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J (ORAL) 1. These cross appeals both impugn order dated 25.08.2020, whereby the application under Section 24 of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 (hereinafter referred to as the 'Act') was disposed of by the Family Court. Signature Not Verified Digitally Signed MAT. APP. (F.C.) 120/2020 & 148/2020 Page 1 of 5 By:KUNAL MAGGU Signing Date:25.01.2023 10:26:45 Neutral Citation Number : 2023/DHC/000536 2. This Court had prolonged interaction with the parties and their parents in chamber and after interaction, parties have been able to amicably resolve all their disputes. 3. Both parties have agreed to dissolve their marriage by way of mutual consent and a joint affidavit dated 23.01.2023 duly signed by the parties has been handed over in the Court. The same is taken on record. 4. Parties, who are present in Court, confirm that they have settled their disputes. It is prayed that the petition filed under Section 13 (1) of the Act filed by the respondent/husband be permitted to be amended to convert the same into a joint petition under Section 13B of First Motion. 5. Respondent/husband has undertaken to pay a sum of Rs.60 lakhs to respondent/wife in full and final settlement of all her past, present and future claims towards permanent and interim maintenance, permanent and interim alimony, stridhan, jewellery, gifts, other articles etc. and all her claims. It is undertaken by the respondent/husband that out of the said amount of Rs.60 lakhs, a sum of Rs.50 lakhs shall be paid to the appellant/wife at the time of recording of the joint statement of the parties of the Second Motion under Section 13B (2). Further sum of Rs.10 lakhs has been undertaken to be paid within one year from today. A post dated cheque dated 23.01.2024 shall be handed over by the respondent/husband to the appellant/wife also at the time of recording of the statement for the Second Motion. Signature Not Verified Digitally Signed MAT. APP. (F.C.) 120/2020 & 148/2020 Page 2 of 5 By:KUNAL MAGGU Signing Date:25.01.2023 10:26:45 Neutral Citation Number : 2023/DHC/000536 Respondent/husband, who is present in Court, undertakes that the cheque shall be honoured on its presentation. 6. It is also undertaken by the respondent/husband as well his parents, who are present in Court, that the suit for damages and the criminal complaint filed by Mr. Kartik Sachdeva, the brother of the respondent/husband shall also be unconditionally withdrawn. Mr. Jauhar, learned counsel submits that he is also the counsel for Mr. Kartik Sachdeva and has already taken instructions that the said proceedings shall also be withdrawn in view of the settlement. He further submits that he has instructions that appropriate applications/petitions for withdrawal of the proceedings by Mr. Kartik Sachdeva shall be filed within 7 days from today. 7. Appellant/wife further undertakes that she shall cooperate in quashing of the FIR No.378/2020 under Sections 498A/34, 354 and 506 IPC, police station-Patel Nagar, which shall be filed within 7 days of the grant of decree of divorce by the Family Court by mutual consent. She also undertakes that on payment of the said amount of Rs.60 lakhs as aforesaid, all her claims shall be fully and finally settled. 8. Parties further undertake that they shall be moving a joint petition for divorce within the outer limit of 30 days from today. 9. The respective undertakings of the parties are accepted. Parties are bound down to the statements given to the Court. Signature Not Verified Digitally Signed MAT. APP. (F.C.) 120/2020 & 148/2020 Page 3 of 5 By:KUNAL MAGGU Signing Date:25.01.2023 10:26:45 Neutral Citation Number : 2023/DHC/000536 10. In view of the above settlement, the oral prayer of the parties is allowed, the petition filed under Section 13 (1) of the Act by the respondent/husband is allowed to be amended and the petition filed by the respondent/husband under Section 13 (1) of the Act being HMA No.2066/2019, titled Sarthak Vs. Karishma Chadha, is converted into a petition under Section 13B (1) of the Act on the records of the Family Court. 11. The amended petition duly signed and supported by respective affidavit of parties is directed to be filed before the Family Court on 28.01.2023, when the matter is already stated to be listed before the Family Court. 12. Parties shall be personally present before the Family Court on 28.01.2023 for recording of their respective statements under Section 13B (1) of the Act. It is also directed that the parties shall move the petition under Section 13B (2) within with the outer limit of 30 days from today as undertaken. 13. On an application being filed, seeking waiver of the statutory period of six months, the Family Court shall take into account the fact that the parties have separated in 2018 and have been litigating since September, 2019 and grant waiver of the statutory period of six month as prescribed under Section 13 (B) (2). 14. Appeals are disposed of in the above terms and the impugned order dated 25.03.2020 shall stand merged in this order. Signature Not Verified Digitally Signed MAT. APP. (F.C.) 120/2020 & 148/2020 Page 4 of 5 By:KUNAL MAGGU Signing Date:25.01.2023 10:26:45 Neutral Citation Number : 2023/DHC/000536 15. Order dasti under signature of the Court Master. SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J. VIKAS MAHAJAN, J. JANUARY 23, 2023 NA Signature Not Verified Digitally Signed MAT. APP. (F.C.) 120/2020 & 148/2020 Page 5 of 5 By:KUNAL MAGGU Signing Date:25.01.2023 10:26:45

Similar Judgements

Mohit alias Sonu and Another Vs. State of U.P. and Another [July 1, 2013] 2013 Latest Caselaw 428 SC

Mohit alias Sonu and another Vs. State of U.P. and another [Criminal Appeal No. 814 of 2013 arising out of SLP (CRL.) No.1619 of 2010] M.Y. EQBAL, J. Leave granted. 2. This appeal is directed agai...

View Details

M.SIDDIQ (D) vs. MAHANT SURESH DAS 2019 Latest Caselaw 1091 SC

(Constitution Bench) Before :- Ranjan Gogoi CJI, S.A. Bobde, Dr. Dhananjaya Y. Chandrachud, Ashok Bhushan and S. Abdul Nazeer, JJ. Civil Appeal Nos 10866-10867 of 2010. D/d. 9.11.2019. M. Siddiq (D...

View Details

SRI MUNIRAJU GOWDA P. M. vs. SRI MUNIRATHNA 2020 Latest Caselaw 553 SC

Before :- S.A. Bobde, CJI, A.S. Bopanna and V. Ramasubramanian, JJ. Special Leave Petition (Civil) Nos. 6787-6788 of 2020. D/d. 13.10.2020. Sri Muniraju Gowda P.M. - Petitioners Versus Sri Munirat...

View Details

Rahul Vs. State of Delhi Ministry of Home Affairs 2022 Latest Caselaw 883 SC

Rahul Vs. State of Delhi Ministry of Home Affairs & Anr. [Criminal Appeal No. 611 of 2022] Ravi Kumar Vs. State of Nct of Delhi [Criminal Appeal Nos. 612-613 of 2022] Vinod @ Chhotu Vs. State Govt...

View Details

Vi Exports India Private Limited vs Union Of India, Ministry Of Commerce And ... 2024 Latest Caselaw 276 Del

Delhi High Court Vi Exports India Private Limited vs Union Of India, Ministry Of Commerce And ... on 9 January, 2024 Author: Subramonium Prasad Bench: Subramonium Prasad * ...

View Details

Abhishek Verma vs Mansi Mittal 2024 Latest Caselaw 283 Del

Delhi High Court Abhishek Verma vs Mansi Mittal on 9 January, 2024 Author: Rajiv Shakdher Bench: Rajiv Shakdher, Amit Bansal $~9 * IN THE HIG...

View Details