Logo
niyam.ai BETA

Mukesh Kumar Gupta Vs. Commissioner of Customs & C.Excise & ANR [2008] INSC 1920 (10 November 2008) 2008 Latest Caselaw 11 SC

Judges: LOKESHWAR SINGH PANTA

Full Judgement

Mukesh Kumar Gupta Vs. Commissioner of Customs & C.Excise & ANR [2008] INSC 1920 (10 November 2008) Judgment SUPREME COURT OF INDIA RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil) No(s).6834/2006 (Arising out of judgment and order dated 7.10.2005 passed in CMWP 1362/2005 and final order dated 16.11.2005 of the Customs, Excise & Service Tax Appellate Tribunal, New Delhi being final order No.946/2005-Cus in Appeal No.C/639/2005) MUKESH KUMAR GUPTA Petitioner(s) VERSUS COMMISSIONER OF CUSTOMS & C.EXCISE & ANR Respondent(s) Date: 10/11/2008 This Petition was called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE LOKESHWAR SINGH PANTA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AFTAB ALAM For Petitioner(s) Ms. Karuna Nundy, Adv. Ms. Meenakshi Arora,Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr. B. Datta, ASG Mr. Navin Prakash, Adv. Mr. B. Krishna Prasad,Adv. UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following ORDER Leave granted. The appeal is disposed of in terms of the signed order. (Sukhbir Paul Kaur) (Vinod Kulvi) Court Master Court Master (Signed Order is placed on the file)s IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NO. 6639 OF 2008 (Arising out of S.L.P.(C) No.6834 of 2006) MUKESH KUMAR GUPTA Appellant(s) Versus COMMISSIONER OF CUSTOMS & C. EXCISE & ANR. Respondent(s) ORDER We have heard learned counsel for the parties. Leave granted. This appeal by special leave is directed against the judgment and order dated 7.10.2005 passed by the High court of Judicature at Allahabad in Civil Misc. Writ Petition No.1362 of 2005 and final judgment and order dated 16.11.2005 passed by the Customs, Excise & Service Tax Appellate Tribunal, New Delhi being final order No.946 of 2005-Cus in appeal No. C/639 of 2005. In the facts and circumstances of the case, we set aside the Order dated 16th November, 2005 passed by the Appellate Tribunal in Appeal No. 639 of 2005 dismissing the appeal of the appellant for default of the payment of the pre deposit of the penalty amount of Rs.10,00,000/- subject to the condition that the appellant shall deposit a sum of Rs.4,50,000/- (Rupees Four lacs fifty thousand only) in addition to Rs.50,000/- stated to have already been deposited within a period of four months from the date of receipt of the copy of this order as a condition precedent on pre-deposit of the amount. On deposit of the said amount, the appeal shall be restored to its original number and decided on merits by the Tribunal. The appellant was directed to pay a sum of Rs.10,000/- to the Supreme Court Legal Services Committee as per the direction of this Court dated 25th April, 2008 entitling him to file the Rejoinder Affidavit within two weeks. Since, we are disposing of the appeal in the aforesaid terms, we, in the interest of justice, order that the appellant is not required to deposit the said amount, if already not deposited. The appeal stands disposed of in the above terms. ......................J. (LOKESHWAR SINGH PANTA) .....................J.

Similar Judgements

All India Judges Association Vs. Union of India & Ors. 2024 Latest Caselaw 20 SC

All India Judges Association Vs. Union of India & Ors. [Writ Petition (Civil) No. 643 of 2015] [Special Leave Petition (Civil) Nos. 6471-6473 of 2020, 29232 of 2018] [Contempt Petition (Civil) Nos....

View Details

Bilkis Yakub Rasool Vs. Union of India & Ors. 2024 Latest Caselaw 25 SC

Bilkis Yakub Rasool Vs. Union of India & Ors. [Writ Petition (Crl.) No. 491 of 2022] [Writ Petition (Crl.) No. 319 of 2022] [Writ Petition (Crl.) No. 326 of 2022] [Writ Petition (Crl.) No. 352 of ...

View Details

Bilkis Yakub Rasool Vs. Union of India & Ors. 2024 Latest Caselaw 26 SC

Bilkis Yakub Rasool Vs. Union of India & Ors. [Writ Petition (Crl.) No. 491 of 2022] [Writ Petition (Crl.) No. 319 of 2022] [Writ Petition (Crl.) No. 326 of 2022] [Writ Petition (Crl.) No. 352 of ...

View Details

Krishan Vs. State of Haryana 2024 Latest Caselaw 52 SC

Krishan Vs. State of Haryana [Criminal Appeal No. 2351 of 2011] Abhay S. Oka, J. Factual Aspects 1. The appellant is accused no.2, who, along with accused no.1 - Mahesh, was convicted for the offe...

View Details

Ex-Const/Dvr Mukesh Kumar Raigar Vs. Union of India 2023 Latest Caselaw 28 SC

Ex-Const/Dvr Mukesh Kumar Raigar Vs. Union of India & Ors. [Special Leave Petition (Civil) No. 10499 of 2022] Bela M. Trivedi, J. 1. The present special leave petition is directed against the judgm...

View Details

Rajaram S/o. Sriramulu Naidu (D) through LRS. Vs. Maruthachalam (D) through LRS. 2023 Latest Caselaw 41 SC

Rajaram S/o. Sriramulu Naidu (D) through LRS. Vs. Maruthachalam (D) through LRS. [Criminal Appeal No.1978 of 2013] [Criminal Appeal No. 1990 of 2013] [Civil Appeal No. 10500 of 2013] [Civil Appeal...

View Details