Logo
niyam.ai

Madhu Vachaspati Institute Of ... vs Pharmacy Council Of India 2023 Latest Caselaw 253 Del

Judges:

Full Judgement

Delhi High Court Madhu Vachaspati Institute Of ... vs Pharmacy Council Of India on 19 January, 2023 1 Neutral citation Number 2023/DHC/000469 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 16769/2022 Date of Decision: 19.01.2023 IN THE MATTER OF: MADHU VACHASPATI INSTITUTE OF PHARMACY PHARMACY, AT RASOOLABAD URG KOILAHA PURAMUFTI, G.T. ROAD, KAUSHAMBI, UTTAR PRADESH-212213 THROUGH ITS REGISTRAR ..... Petitioner Through: Mr.Sanjay Sharawat, Mr.Divyank Rana and Mr.Ashok Kumar, Advocates. Versus PHARMACY COUNCIL OF INDIA NBCC CENTRE, 3RD FLOOR, PLOT NO.2 COMMUNITY CENTRE, MAA ANANDAMAI MARG, OKHLA PHASE-1 LANDMARK (NEAR HOTEL CROWNE PLAZA) NEW DELHI - 110020, THROUGH ITS REGISTRAR CUM MEMBER SECRETARY ..... Respondent Through: Mr.Abhishek Singh, Mr.Amit Bhalla and Ms.Aparna Singh, Advocates. + W.P.(C) 16799/2022 J.M.B. INSTITUTE J.M.B. INSTITUTE, (ALSO KNOWN AS J.M.B. INSTITUTE OF LIFE SCIENCES & HIGHER EDUCATION) BEING RUN AND MANAGED BY JAGVATI DEVI MOOL CHAND BABOO RAM INSTITUTE OF LIFE SCIENCES AND HIGHER EDUCATION), 102, MADHOTANDA ROAD, PILIBHIT, UTTAR PRADESH-262001, THROUGH ITS SECRETARY ..... Petitioner Through: Mr.Sanjay Sharawat, Mr.Divyank Rana and Mr.Ashok Kumar, Advocates. Signature Not Verified Signed By:PRATIMA Signing Date:23.01.2023 12:31:34 2 Neutral citation Number 2023/DHC/000469 versus PHARMACY COUNCIL OF INDIA NBCC CENTRE, 3RD FLOOR, PLOT NO.2 COMMUNITY CENTRE, MAA ANANDAMAI MARG, OKHLA PHASE-1 LANDMARK (NEAR HOTEL CROWNE PLAZA) NEW DELHI - 110020, THROUGH ITS REGISTRAR CUM MEMBER SECRETARY ..... Respondent Through: : Mr.Abhishek Singh, Mr.Amit Bhalla and Ms.Aparna Singh, Advocates. + W.P.(C) 16801/2022 SHRI GULAB SINGH COLLEGE OF PHARMACY SHRI GULAB SINGH COLLEGE OF PHARMACY, PLOT NO.337, OPPOSITE G.S. LAW COLLEGE, VILLAGE MALEPUR, POST FARIDPUR, AURAIYA TO PHAPHUND ROAD, AURAIYA, UTTAR PRADESH-206122, BEING RUN AND MANAGED BY SHRI GULAB SINGH SHIKSHA PRASAR SAMITI, THROUGH AUTHORISED SIGNATORY..... Petitioner Through: Mr.Sanjay Sharawat, Mr.Divyank Rana and Mr.Ashok Kumar, Advocates. versus PHARMACY COUNCIL OF INDIA NBCC CENTRE, 3RD FLOOR, PLOT NO.2 COMMUNITY CENTRE, MAA ANANDAMAI MARG, OKHLA PHASE-1 LANDMARK (NEAR HOTEL CROWNE PLAZA) NEW DELHI - 110020, THROUGH ITS REGISTRAR CUM MEMBER SECRETARY ..... Respondent Through: Mr.Abhishek Singh, Mr.Amit Bhalla and Ms.Aparna Singh, Advocates. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PURUSHAINDRA KUMAR KAURAV JUDGMENT Signature Not Verified Signed By:PRATIMA Signing Date:23.01.2023 12:31:34 3 Neutral citation Number 2023/DHC/000469 PURUSHAINDRA KUMAR KAURAV, J. (ORAL) 1. These petitions seek to challenge the common decision of rejection of the applications of the petitioners-institutions for grant of approval of B.Pharm course by the Pharmacy Council Of India (PCI) and therefore, the same are being taken up for hearing analogously. 2. The facts are referred from W.P.(C)16769/2022. 3. The petitioner-institution being desirous of opening B.Pharm Course made an application to PCI for grant of approval on 30.12.2021. The petitioner-institution had obtained consent of affiliating University and examination authority which was duly communicated to PCI. 4. On 25.07.2022 in terms of 370th Meeting of Executive Committee (EC) of PCI, the application of the petitioner-Institution was rejected by the PCI on the ground of non-submission of NOC by the concerned State Government. 5. The petitioner approached the Hon'ble High Court of Allahabad and in terms of the directions issued by the Hon'ble High Court, the State Government had granted NOC to the petitioner-institution. 6. On 23.09.2022, petitioner-institution had submitted NOC to the PCI in the form of compliance on the PCI portal. According to the petitioner-institution all other requirements in accordance with the Pharmacy Act, 1948 and the Regulations were being fulfilled by the petitioner-institution. Despite that, in terms of meeting held on 11.11.2022 (381st meeting) the PCI rejected the application of the institution on the ground that the Institution has failed to appoint faculty and facilities as per the statutory provision. 7. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner states that firstly, the decision which was taken by the PCI only pointed out the Signature Not Verified Signed By:PRATIMA Signing Date:23.01.2023 12:31:34 4 Neutral citation Number 2023/DHC/000469 deficiency with respect to the NOC. Once the NOC requirements were fulfilled, it was not permissible for the PCI to again point out some different deficiencies. According to him, the PCI being statutory authority, should decide the matter and consider the application in a comprehensive manner. The piecemeal decisions are neither in the interest of the PCI nor in the interest of the institution rather the same go contrary to the public interest at large. 8. Nevertheless, the case of the petitioner is that the petitioner fulfils all requirements including the faculty etc., and if proper opportunity of hearing is afforded to the petitioner, then the petitioner would satisfy that there is no deficiency existing in the petitioner-Institution. 9. In W.P.(C) 16799/2022, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner states that in the form of an appeal/compliance, detailed representation was made to the PCI. The same has also not yet been decided by the PCI. In sum and substance, the submission made by learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner is that whatever may be the deficiencies, if the same are pointed out to the petitioner- institution and appropriate opportunity is given, then the petitioner- Institution would be able to satisfy the PCI and accordingly, the PCI can proceed with the respective application. 10. This court while considering the cases of institutions relating to D.Pharm, has taken a view that the decision of the PCI should contain specific deficiencies and before taking such decisions, the PCI is required to intimate/furnish the report of inspection to the respective Institution granting them sufficient time to rectify those deficiencies. 11. Having considered the submissions made by the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the parties and in view of the decision taken in Signature Not Verified Signed By:PRATIMA Signing Date:23.01.2023 12:31:34 5 Neutral citation Number 2023/DHC/000469 W.P.(C) 150/2023 Raghunathpur College Of Pharmacy v. Pharmacy Council Of India, this court finds it appropriate to dispose of these writ petitions with the following directions:- (i) Impugned decisions relating to petitioners are hereby set- aside. (ii) PCI is directed to point out deficiencies with respect to each Institution to the concerned representative of the petitioners, within a period of 21 days from today with inspection report. (iii) After receipt of the communication from PCI, each institution would be entitled to rectify the deficiencies if any, and to submit the explanation to the PCI within a period of seven days. (iv) Depending upon the submission/explanation made by each institution, the PCI is directed to take a final decision within a period of two weeks thereafter, with respect to approval for the academic session 2023-2024. (v) Any compliance/appeal filed by any of the petitioners in pursuance to PCI circulars dated 14.12.2022 and 17.01.2023, stands withdrawn as all the petitioners have been directed to take a fresh re-course in terms of the directions given in this order. Needless to state that nothing expressed in this order be construed to be an expression on the merits of the entitlement of the approval of the petitioner-institutions or on the validity of circular dated 14.12.2022 and 17.01.2023. 12. It is directed that if in case, the PCI decides not to grant the approval to any petitioners-institutions, the PCI should specifically point out the deficiencies in its decision so that the petitioners would be at Signature Not Verified Signed By:PRATIMA Signing Date:23.01.2023 12:31:34 6 Neutral citation Number 2023/DHC/000469 liberty to take appropriate recourse in accordance with law. 13. Accordingly, the petitions stand disposed of. PURUSHAINDRA KUMAR KAURAV, J JANUARY 19, 2023/MJ Signature Not Verified Signed By:PRATIMA Signing Date:23.01.2023 12:31:34

Similar Judgements

All India Judges Association Vs. Union of India & Ors. 2024 Latest Caselaw 20 SC

All India Judges Association Vs. Union of India & Ors. [Writ Petition (Civil) No. 643 of 2015] [Special Leave Petition (Civil) Nos. 6471-6473 of 2020, 29232 of 2018] [Contempt Petition (Civil) Nos....

View Details

Sita Soren Vs. Union of India 2024 Latest Caselaw 135 SC

Sita Soren Vs. Union of India [Criminal Appeal No. 451 of 2019] Dr. Dhananjaya Y. Chandrachud, CJI Table of Contents A. Reference 4 B. Overview of the judgment in PV Narasimha Rao 8 C. Submissions...

View Details

Mahanadi Coalfields Ltd. Vs. Brajrajnagar Coal Mines Workers' Union 2024 Latest Caselaw 158 SC

Mahanadi Coalfields Ltd. Vs. Brajrajnagar Coal Mines Workers' Union [Civil Appeal No(s). 4092-4093/2024 arising out of SLP (C) No(s). 6370-6371/2024 arising out of SLP (C) Diary No. 32072 /2021] Pam...

View Details

Deepak Gaba and Ors. Vs. State of Uttar Pradesh 2023 Latest Caselaw 1 SC

Deepak Gaba and Ors. Vs. State of Uttar Pradesh and Anr. [Criminal Appeal No. 2328 of 2022] Sanjiv Khanna, J. 1. This appeal by Jotun India Private Limited (JIPL), Deepak Gaba - Regional Sales Mana...

View Details

Deepak Gaba and Ors. Vs. State of Uttar Pradesh 2023 Latest Caselaw 1 SC

Deepak Gaba and Ors. Vs. State of Uttar Pradesh and Anr. [Criminal Appeal No. 2328 of 2022] Sanjiv Khanna, J. 1. This appeal by Jotun India Private Limited (JIPL), Deepak Gaba - Regional Sales Mana...

View Details

State of Himachal Pradesh Vs. Goel Bus Service Kullu 2023 Latest Caselaw 19 SC

State of Himachal Pradesh and Ors. Vs. Goel Bus Service Kullu Etc. [Civil Appeal No (s). 5534-5594 of 2011] Vikram Nath, J. 1. The above set of appeals were referred to larger Bench of three Judges...

View Details