Logo
niyam.ai BETA

Kotak Mahindra Bank Ltd vs Matrubhoomi Dairy Pvt. Ltd 2024 Latest Caselaw 3904 Bom

Judges:

Full Judgement

Bombay High Court Kotak Mahindra Bank Ltd vs Matrubhoomi Dairy Pvt. Ltd on 8 February, 2024 Author: Abhay Ahuja Bench: Abhay Ahuja 17. IAL 24813-23 in EXAL 24468-23.doc IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION INTERIM APPLICATION (L) NO. 24813 OF 2023 IN EXECUTION APPLICATION (L) NO. 24468 OF 2023 Kotak Mahindra Bank Ltd. ...Applicant Vs. Matrubhoomi Dairy Pvt. Ltd. & Ors. ...Respondents Ms. Tikshta Modi with Ms. Jenny Somaiya i/b Akhil Modi and Associates for Applicants. Mr. Gouresh Mogre for Respondents. CORAM : ABHAY AHUJA, J. DATE : 8th FEBRUARY, 2024 P.C. : 1. This interim application has been filed in execution of arbitral award dated 28th February, 2018, whereby the Respondents have been jointly and severally directed to pay to the Applicant Rs. 42,40,361.50 along with further interest @ 15% p.a. from 29 th February, 2018 till payment and / or realization. 2. Ms. Modi, learned Counsel appears for the Applicant-bank and submits that the bank has through various title searches including CERSAI searches as per the report dated 20 th August, 2023, ascertained that the property being B-1401, 14 th Floor with open terrace, Raviraj Palm, Poonam Garden, Near Tamil Church, Mira Road East, Thane- Nikita Gadgil 1/3 ::: Uploaded on - 08/02/2024 ::: Downloaded on - 09/02/2024 09:18:43 ::: 17. IAL 24813-23 in EXAL 24468-23.doc 401107 is unencumbered and that the Respondents may encumber the same and therefore, this Court not only grant prayers for disclosure of the Respondents assets but also pass a restraint order in respect of the aforementioned property. 3. Mr. Mogre, learned Counsel appears for the Respondents and submits that he needs some time to take complete instructions as he only has copy of the interim application without exhibits. 4. Ms. Modi, learned Counsel for the Applicant submits that service to the Respondents has been effected and complete sets of the interim application along with exhibits has already been served upon the Respondents and seeks to tender affidavit of service in this regard. 5. Let the affidavit of service be filed in the Registry. Let the complete copy of the interim application along with exhibits be furnished to the learned Counsel for the Respondents. 6. Mr. Mogre, learned Counsel for the Respondents also submits that he would need time to take instructions as his client has taken loans from multiple lenders. Nikita Gadgil 2/3 ::: Uploaded on - 08/02/2024 ::: Downloaded on - 09/02/2024 09:18:43 ::: 17. IAL 24813-23 in EXAL 24468-23.doc 7. Having heard the learned Counsel and having perused the application, this Court is of the view that the relief in terms of prayer clause (f) be granted. Let the Respondents disclose on oath the assets (both movable / immovable held / owned by them) including details of the all bank accounts (with account numbers, bank and branch etc.) and all amounts lying in the bank accounts and also all debts and receivables payable by third party to the Judgment Debtors with exact addresses, within a period of four weeks. 8. In the meanwhile, let there also be a restraint on the Respondents from in any manner whatsoever dealing with or disposing off the property being B-1401, 14th Floor with open terrace, Raviraj Palm, Poonam Garden, Near Tamil Church, Mira Road East, Thane- 401107 till the next date. 9. List on 7th March, 2024. Let reply, if any, also be filed by the next date. (ABHAY AHUJA, J.) Nikita Gadgil 3/3 ::: Uploaded on - 08/02/2024 ::: Downloaded on - 09/02/2024 09:18:43 :::

Similar Judgements

Maha kali Sujatha Vs. The Branch Manager, Future Generali India Life Insurance Company Ltd. & Anr. 2024 Latest Caselaw 238 SC

Maha kali Sujatha Vs. The Branch Manager, Future Generali India Life Insurance Company Ltd. & Anr. [Civil Appeal No. 3821 of 2024] Nagarathna, J. 1. The present civil appeal has been filed by the c...

View Details

Kotak Mahindra Bank Limited Vs. Girnar Corrugators Pvt. Ltd. & Ors. 2023 Latest Caselaw 5 SC

Kotak Mahindra Bank Limited Vs. Girnar Corrugators Pvt. Ltd. & Ors. CIVIL APPEAL NO.6662 OF 2022 M.R. SHAH, J. 1. Feeling aggrieved by and dissatisfied with the impugned judgment and order passed b...

View Details

Kotak Mahindra Bank Limited Vs. Girnar Corrugators Pvt. Ltd. & Ors. 2023 Latest Caselaw 5 SC

Kotak Mahindra Bank Limited Vs. Girnar Corrugators Pvt. Ltd. & Ors. CIVIL APPEAL NO.6662 OF 2022 M.R. SHAH, J. 1. Feeling aggrieved by and dissatisfied with the impugned judgment and order passed b...

View Details

Kotak Mahindra Bank Ltd. Vs. Girnar Corrugators Pvt. Ltd. 2023 Latest Caselaw 10 SC

Kotak Mahindra Bank Ltd. Vs. Girnar Corrugators Pvt. Ltd. & Ors. [Civil Appeal No. 6662 of 2022] M.R. Shah, J. 1. Feeling aggrieved by and dissatisfied with the impugned judgment and order passed b...

View Details

Gas Authority of India Ltd. Vs. Indian Petrochemicals Corp. Ltd. & Ors. 2023 Latest Caselaw 82 SC

M/s. Gas Authority of India Ltd. Vs. M/s. Indian Petrochemicals Corp. Ltd. & Ors. [Civil Appeal Nos. 3504-3505 of 2010] Sanjay Kishan Kaul, J. 1. M/s Gas Authority of India Limited (for short 'GAIL...

View Details

Ajay Kumar Radheyshyam Goenka Vs. Tourism Finance Corporation of India Ltd. 2023 Latest Caselaw 205 SC

Ajay Kumar Radheyshyam Goenka Vs. Tourism Finance Corporation of India Ltd. [Criminal Appeal No. 172 of 2023] [Criminal Appeal No. 170/2023] [Criminal Appeal No. 171/2023] Sanjay Kishan Kaul, J. ...

View Details