Logo
niyam.ai

Adarsh Cooperative Housing Society Ltd. Vs. Central Bureau of Investigation [July 31, 2018] 2018 Latest Caselaw 505 SC

Judges:

Full Judgement

Adarsh Cooperative Housing Society Ltd. Vs. Central Bureau of Investigation [Criminal Appeal No. 952 of 2018 @ Special Leave Petition (CRL.) No. 2631 of 2018] KURIAN, J. 1. Leave granted. 2. This Court permitted the appellant to withdraw the amounts claimed by the banks on furnishing security of immovable property, as per order dated 05.01.2018 in Criminal Appeal No. 19 of 2018. 3. When the appellant offered security of the immovable property, wherein the housing complex is situated, that was turned down as per the impugned order passed by the CBI Special Judge, Greater Mumbai, holding that the disputed structure is standing on the land, which is being offered as a security and being the subject matter of the case, the land cannot be accepted as a security. Thus aggrieved, the appellant is before this Court. 4. We have heard Mr. Vikramjit Banerjee, learned Additional Solicitor General appearing for the first respondent and Mr. Nishant R. Katneshwarkar, learned counsel appearing for the State of Maharashtra. Though the application is seriously opposed by both the respondents, the fact remains that the land was allotted to the appellant by the State of Maharashtra on payment of Rs. 12.61 Crores, as per Allotment Letter dated 09.07.2004. The learned counsel for appellant submits that the amounts which are frozen, are required for litigation expenses and, therefore, denial of the same would amount to denial of access to justice. 5. In the above circumstances, we do not propose to go into the various contentions taken by the State since we are only concerned with the release of the amounts on offering the land as a security. Therefore, leaving all the contentions open, and without prejudice to the contentions taken by the CBI as well as by the State, the impugned order dated 01.03.2018 passed by the CBI Special Judge is set aside. The Special Judge, CBI is directed to accept the security of the land, as offered by the appellant and release the amounts. 6. In view of the above, the appeal is disposed of. .......................J. [KURIAN JOSEPH] .......................J. [SANJAY KISHAN KAUL] New Delhi; July 31, 2018. Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App

Similar Judgements

Pradeep Kumar Vs. State of Haryana 2024 Latest Caselaw 22 SC

Pradeep Kumar Vs. State of Haryana [Criminal Appeal No. 1338 of 2010] Pamidighantam Sri Narasimha, J. 1. The sole appellant herein was tried along with another accused for the murder of one Samsher...

View Details

Gajanand Sharma Vs. Adarsh Siksha Parisad Samiti 2023 Latest Caselaw 44 SC

Gajanand Sharma Vs. Adarsh Siksha Parisad Samiti & Ors. [Civil Appeal Nos. 100-101 of 2023 @ SLP (C) Nos. 12645-12646 of 2022] M. R. Shah, J. 1. Feeling aggrieved and dissatisfied with the impugned...

View Details

Indore Development Authority Vs. Burhani Grih Nirman Sahakari Sanstha Maryadit Sneh Nagar and Ors. 2023 Latest Caselaw 174 SC

Indore Development Authority Vs. Burhani Grih Nirman Sahakari Sanstha Maryadit Sneh Nagar and Ors. [Civil Appeal No. 5071 of 2022] [Civil Appeal No. 5099 of 2022] [Civil Appeal No. 5074 of 2022] [...

View Details

Narayan Chetanram Chaudhary Vs. State of Maharashtra 2023 Latest Caselaw 267 SC

Narayan Chetanram Chaudhary Vs. State of Maharashtra [Criminal Miscellaneous Petition No. 157334 of 2018] [Review Petition (Criminal) Nos. 11391140 of 2000] [Criminal Appeal Nos. 2526 of 2000] Ani...

View Details

Lok Prahari Vs. Union of India & Ors 2023 Latest Caselaw 268 SC

Lok Prahari Vs. Union of India & Ors [Writ Petition (Civil) No. 1141 of 2020] Dr. Dhananjaya Y. Chandrachud, CJI 1. The jurisdiction of this Court under Article 32 of the Constitution has been invo...

View Details

NTPC Ltd. Vs. SPML Infra Ltd. 2023 Latest Caselaw 290 SC

NTPC Ltd. Vs. M/s. SPML Infra Ltd. [Civil Appeal No. 4778 of 2022] Pamidighantam Sri Narasimha, J. 1. The present appeal arises out of a decision of the High Court of Delhi1, allowing the Responden...

View Details