Logo
niyam.ai BETA

Ashok Vitthalrao Sirsode vs The State Of Maharashtra Through The ... 2024 Latest Caselaw 121 Bom

Judges:

Full Judgement

Bombay High Court Ashok Vitthalrao Sirsode vs The State Of Maharashtra Through The ... on 3 January, 2024 Author: G. A. Sanap Bench: G. A. Sanap 2024:BHC-NAG:81 -1- 18.CAF.803.2023.odt IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH AT NAGPUR CIVIL APPLICATION (CAF) NO. 803 OF 2023 IN FIRST APPEAL ST. NO. 16673 OF 2022 Ashok Vitthalrao Sirsode Vs. The State of Maharashtra, through the Collector, Amravati & Ors. ********************************************************************************************** Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Court's or Judge's orders appearances, Court's orders of directions and Registrar's orders ********************************************************************************************** Mr. N.S. Bhelkar, Advocate for the Applicant/Appellant. Mr. H.D. Dubey, AGP for Respondent Nos.1 & 2/State. Mr. M.A. Kadu, Advocate for Respondent No.3. CORAM : G. A. SANAP, J. DATED : 3rd JANUARY, 2024. Heard learned advocates for the parties. 2. This is an application for condonation of 3699 days delay caused in filing an appeal against the impugned judgment and award dated 04.06.2010, passed by the Reference Court. The reasons have been stated in the application. 3. Learned AGP for respondent Nos.1 and 2, relying upon a decision in the case of New Okhla Industrial Development Authority Vs. Rameshwar @ Ramesh Chandra Sharma (Dead), through Legal Heir and another [2022 SCC Online SC 1599], submits that delay may be condoned, subject to condition that the original land owner/claimant/appellant herein shall not be entitled to get any benefits, including the interest payable under the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 on the enhanced amount of compensation for the delayed period. 4. Learned advocate for the applicant/appellant submits that the Court may pass an appropriate order. -2- 18.CAF.803.2023.odt 5. In view of the above, the application is allowed. Delay of 3699 days caused in filing the appeal is condoned. 6. It is made clear that the original land owner/claimant/appellant herein shall not be entitled to get any statutory benefits, including the interest payable under the Land Acquisition Act on the enhanced amount of compensation for the delayed period of 3699 days, in case the appeal is allowed. 7. The appeal be registered. 8. The application stands disposed of, accordingly. FIRST APPEAL ST. NO. 16673 OF 2022 9. Heard. 10. Admit. 11. Learned AGP waives service of notice on behalf of respondent Nos.1 and 2. 12. Learned advocate Mr. M.A. Kadu waives service of notice on behalf of respondent No.3. 13. Call for record and proceedings. 14. Paper-book be filed within twelve weeks from the date of receipt of record and proceedings. 15. If the paper-book is not filed within twelve weeks from the date of receipt of record and proceedings, then the matter shall stand dismissed without further reference to the Court. (G. A. SANAP, J.) Signed by: Mr. Vijay Kumar Vijay Designation: PA To Honourable Judge Date: 04/01/2024 12:40:56

Similar Judgements

All India Judges Association Vs. Union of India & Ors. 2024 Latest Caselaw 20 SC

All India Judges Association Vs. Union of India & Ors. [Writ Petition (Civil) No. 643 of 2015] [Special Leave Petition (Civil) Nos. 6471-6473 of 2020, 29232 of 2018] [Contempt Petition (Civil) Nos....

View Details

Bilkis Yakub Rasool Vs. Union of India & Ors. 2024 Latest Caselaw 25 SC

Bilkis Yakub Rasool Vs. Union of India & Ors. [Writ Petition (Crl.) No. 491 of 2022] [Writ Petition (Crl.) No. 319 of 2022] [Writ Petition (Crl.) No. 326 of 2022] [Writ Petition (Crl.) No. 352 of ...

View Details

Bilkis Yakub Rasool Vs. Union of India & Ors. 2024 Latest Caselaw 26 SC

Bilkis Yakub Rasool Vs. Union of India & Ors. [Writ Petition (Crl.) No. 491 of 2022] [Writ Petition (Crl.) No. 319 of 2022] [Writ Petition (Crl.) No. 326 of 2022] [Writ Petition (Crl.) No. 352 of ...

View Details

Shatrughna Atmaram Patil & Ors. Vs. Vinod Dodhu Chaudhary & Anr. 2024 Latest Caselaw 61 SC

Shatrughna Atmaram Patil & Ors. Vs. Vinod Dodhu Chaudhary & Anr. [Special Leave Petition (Crl.) No. 14585/2023] Jaipal Manikrao Hire & Ors. Vs. Vijaykumar Vishwanath Dhawale & Anr. [Special Leave P...

View Details

Vinod Katara Vs. State of Uttar Pradesh 2024 Latest Caselaw 138 SC

Vinod Katara Vs. State of Uttar Pradesh [Writ Petition (Crl.) No(S). 121 of 2022] Mehta, J. 1. This writ petition arises from a very peculiar set of facts and circumstances. 2. The petitioner here...

View Details

Travancore Devaswom Board Vs. Ayyappa Spices & Ors. 2024 Latest Caselaw 147 SC

Travancore Devaswom Board Vs. Ayyappa Spices & Ors. [Civil Appeal Nos. 3866-3867 of 2024 arising out of SLP (C) Nos. 10361-10362 of 2023] Pamidighantam Sri Narasimha, J. 1. Leave granted. 2. Tirth...

View Details