# VICKY HARI BABU & ORS. vs STATE NCT OF DELHI AND ANR

Court: Delhi High Court
Date: 2026-05-18
Citation: W.P.(CRL)-1595/2026 2026:DHC:4431
Petitioner: VICKY HARI BABU & ORS.
Respondent: STATE NCT OF DELHI AND ANR

[Official PDF on Delhi High Court website](https://delhihighcourt.nic.in/app/showFileJudgment/60818052026CRLW15952026_174952.pdf)

## Judgment text (excerpt)

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision: 18.05.2026 W.P.(CRL) 1595/2026 VICKY HARI BABU & ORS. .....Petitioners Through: Mr. Chetan and Mr. Pawan Kumar, Advocates versus STATE NCT OF DELHI AND ANR .....Respondents Through: Mr. Rahul Tyagi, ASC (Crl.) for the State CORAM: JUSTICE GIRISH KATHPALIA J U D G M E N T (ORAL) 1. Petitioners seek quashing of case FIR No. 322/2016 of Police Station Harsh Vihar for offence under Section 498A/406/34 IPC and Section 4 of Dowry Prohibition Act on the ground that the respondent no. 2 (complainant de facto) has compromised the disputes with the petitioners. 2. State has no objection to this petition. W.P.(CRL) 1595/2026 pages 2.5.4.20=8401dd889b27a77b2f65ffffe4afec455 69af3962c6fb4835d435f97626cacca, ou=HIGH COURT OF DELHI,CID - 7047638, KATHPALIA postalCode=110003, st=Delhi, serialNumber=d3e86796451ec45c07b5d1557 0996b40f80cbd2eee60402c487965ff801e26fa, cn=GIRISH KATHPALIA Date: 2026.05.18 05:27:50 +05'30' 3. The respondent no.2 is present in court today and is identified by IO/SI Rahul Ranjan of PS Harsh Vihar. 4. I have spoken with respondent no.2 in Hindi and it is stated by her that she has compromised all disputes with the p

https://niyam.ai/judgements/high-court/2026/may/vicky-hari-babu-ors-vs-state-nct-of-delhi-and-anr