# VED PARKASH vs STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS

Court: Punjab and Haryana High Court
Date: 2026-05-27
Citation: CRM-M 7611/2026
Petitioner: VED PARKASH
Respondent: STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS

[Official PDF on Punjab and Haryana High Court website](https://livedb9010.phhc.gov.in/public/judgments/order-pdf?case_type=CRM-M&case_no=7611&case_year=2026&order_date=2026-05-27&order_type=FINAL)

## Judgment text (excerpt)

CRM-M-7611-2026 (O & M) ::1:: IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH (136) CRM-M-7611-2026 (O & M) Date of decision: 27.05.2026 Ved Parkash …... Petitioner V/s State of Haryana and ors. ...Respondents CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE JASJIT SINGH BEDI Present: Mr. Paramjeet Singh Jammu, Advocate, for the petitioner. **** JASJIT SINGH BEDI, J. (Oral) The prayer in the present petition under Section 528 BNS, 2023 is for the quashing of the order dated 05.03.2025 (Annexure P-1) passed by the Judicial Magistrate Ist Class, Sirsa in FIR No.78 dated 31.05.2017 under Sections 201, 406, 420, 467, 468, 120B IPC registered at Police Station Baragurha, District Sirsa (Annexure P-3) vide which the application filed by the petitioner under Section 319 Cr.P.C. to summon the private respondents/accused has been dismissed as well as the impugned order dated 09.12.2025 (Annexure P-2) passed by the Additional Sessions Judge, Sirsa SUKHPREET KAUR 2026.06.03 11:22 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document chandigarh CRM-M-7611-2026 (O & M) ::2:: vide which the revision petition against the order dated 05.03.2025 has also been dismissed. 2. The brief facts of the case are that an

https://niyam.ai/judgements/high-court/2026/may/ved-parkash-vs-state-of-haryana-and-others
