# TARSEM SINGH vs STATE OF PUNJAB

Court: Punjab and Haryana High Court
Date: 2026-05-29
Citation: CRM-M 31931/2026
Petitioner: TARSEM SINGH
Respondent: STATE OF PUNJAB

[Official PDF on Punjab and Haryana High Court website](https://livedb9010.phhc.gov.in/public/judgments/order-pdf?case_type=CRM-M&case_no=31931&case_year=2026&order_date=2026-05-29&order_type=FINAL)

## Judgment text (excerpt)

In the High Court for the States of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh 108 CRM-M-31931-2026 (O&M) Date of Decision:- 29.05.2026 Tarsem Singh … Petitioner Versus State of Punjab ... Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUBHAS MEHLA Present:- Mr. Manpreet Singh Sidhu, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Anup Singh, AAG, Punjab. ***** SUBHAS MEHLA, J. (Oral) 1. The present petition has been filed under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (for short - ‘the BNSS’) for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner in case bearing FIR No.41 dated 24.04.2026 (Annexure P-1) under Sections 331(6), 115(2), 118(1), 190 and 191(3) the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 (for short - ‘the BNS’) registered at Police Station Julkan, District Patiala. 2. Allegations levelled as per present FIR are that the petitioner along with other co-accused armed with bricks and sticks caused injuries upon the complainant party. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner has been falsely implicated in the present case. No specific overt act is attributed to the petitioner, nor any injury is attributed to the petitioner. It is further submitted that a similarly situated co-accused

https://niyam.ai/judgements/high-court/2026/may/tarsem-singh-vs-state-of-punjab