# SUNIL RUSTAGI vs SIDDHARHT JAIN AND ORS.

Court: Delhi High Court
Date: 2026-05-11
Citation: FAO-156/2026 2026:DHC:4432
Petitioner: SUNIL RUSTAGI
Respondent: SIDDHARHT JAIN AND ORS.

[Official PDF on Delhi High Court website](https://delhihighcourt.nic.in/app/showFileJudgment/MKO11052026FAO1562026_161923.pdf)

## Judgment text (excerpt)

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision: 11.05.2026 FAO 156/2026 SUNIL RUSTAGI .....Appellant Through: Mr. Sanjay Dewan, Sr. Advocate with Ms. Garima Verma, Mr. Nikhil Goel, Ms. Arshia, Mr. Ujjwal and Mr. Vijay, Advocates. Versus SIDDHARHT JAIN AND ORS. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Harshit Vashisht, Mr. Shivdeep Kr., Ms. Bhavini Kapoor, and Mr. Shartak Tagra, Advocates. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ KUMAR OHRI JUDGEMNT (ORAL) CM APPL. 31534/2026 (exemption) 1. Allowed, subject to all just exceptions. 2. The present application is disposed of. CM APPL. 31532/2026 (delay) 1. By way of the present application, the applicant/appellant seeks condonation of delay of 50 days in refiling the accompanying appeal. 2. For the reasons stated in the application, the same is allowed and the delay of 50 days in refiling the appeal is condoned. 3. Accordingly, the present application is disposed of. 1. Being aggrieved by the order dated 01.12.2025 passed by the learned DJ-04, North District, Rohini Courts, Delhi in Misc. DJ No. 314/2024, whereby his application under Order IX Rule 13 CPC was dismissed, the appellant/defendant no. 4 has preferred this appeal seeking the setting

https://niyam.ai/judgements/high-court/2026/may/sunil-rustagi-vs-siddharht-jain-and-ors