# SUBHAJIT KUMAR RAY vs CENTRAL VIGILANCE COMMISSION AND ANR

Court: Delhi High Court
Date: 2026-05-15
Citation: W.P.(C)-15234/2025 2026:DHC:4390
Petitioner: SUBHAJIT KUMAR RAY
Respondent: CENTRAL VIGILANCE COMMISSION AND ANR

[Official PDF on Delhi High Court website](https://delhihighcourt.nic.in/app/showFileJudgment/59615052026CW152342025_171448.pdf)

## Judgment text (excerpt)

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI W.P.(C) 15234/2025 Date of Decision: 15.05.2026 IN THE MATTER OF: SUBHAJIT KUMAR RAY .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Satyam Parashar, Mr. Kumar Abhishek, Mr. Kumar Bhaskar, Advocates. versus CENTRAL VIGILANCE COMMISSION AND ANR .....Respondents Through: Mr Ravinder Agarwal, Mr Manish Kumar Singh, Mr Vasu Agarwal, Advocates for R-1. Mr Premtosh K Mishra, CGSC, Mr Shrey Sharma, Mr Anubhav Upadhyay, Mr Arpit Bamal Advocates for R-2. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PURUSHAINDRA KUMAR KAURAV JUDGEMENT PURUSHAINDRA KUMAR KAURAV, J. (ORAL) CM APPL. 33128/2026 (BY PETITIONER- EARLY HEARING) 1. For the reasons stated in the application, the same stands allowed. 2. The writ petition is taken up for hearing today itself. W.P.(C) 15234/2025 3. Heard. 4. The petition is for the following reliefs: “(a) Issue a writ of Mandamus or any other appropriate writ, order or direction directing Respondent No.1 to discharge its statutory functions under Section 8(1)(d) and 8(1)(h) of the Central Vigilance Commission Act, 2003 by inquiring or causing an independent inquiry to be made into the Petitioner’s complaint dated 01.04.2024 and to pass a reasoned speaking order there

https://niyam.ai/judgements/high-court/2026/may/subhajit-kumar-ray-vs-central-vigilance-commission-and-anr