# SOHAN LAL SAINI AND ANR vs STATE OF HARYANA AND ANOTHER

Court: Punjab and Haryana High Court
Date: 2026-05-25
Citation: CWP 9089/2026
Petitioner: SOHAN LAL SAINI AND ANR
Respondent: STATE OF HARYANA AND ANOTHER

[Official PDF on Punjab and Haryana High Court website](https://livedb9010.phhc.gov.in/public/judgments/order-pdf?case_type=CWP&case_no=9089&case_year=2026&order_date=2026-05-25&order_type=FINAL)

## Judgment text (excerpt)

CWP No.9089 of 2026 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Sr. No.108 CWP No.9089 of 2026 Date of Decision: 25.05.2026 Sohan Lal Saini and another .... Petitioners Versus State of Haryana and another ... Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE TRIBHUVAN DAHIYA Present: None for the petitioners. Mr. Aakash Singla, Additional Advocate General, Haryana. TRIBHUVAN DAHIYA, J. (ORAL) The petition has been filed inter alia seeking a writ of mandamus directing the respondents to count the period of probation followed by regular service rendered by the petitioners for the purpose of pension, gratuity and other benefits in terms of law laid down by a Division Bench of this Court in State of Haryana and others v. Mohinder Kaur and others, 2025 NCPHHC 94672. 2. Learned State counsel has received instructions from the Department vide memo dated 25.05.2026, which is retained on the case file along with its enclosures as Annexure ‘A’. Referring to the same, he submits that the Department has found that the petitioners’ claim is admissible as per Mohinder Kaur case ibid. The benefits will be released to them in terms of stipulations contained in the judgment, i.e., after deposit of

https://niyam.ai/judgements/high-court/2026/may/sohan-lal-saini-and-anr-vs-state-of-haryana-and-another