# SMT.LALITA NAGPAL vs JAWAHARLAL

Court: Punjab and Haryana High Court
Date: 2026-05-25
Citation: RSA 3214/2000
Petitioner: SMT.LALITA NAGPAL
Respondent: JAWAHARLAL

[Official PDF on Punjab and Haryana High Court website](https://livedb9010.phhc.gov.in/public/judgments/order-pdf?case_type=RSA&case_no=3214&case_year=2000&order_date=2026-05-25&order_type=FINAL)

## Judgment text (excerpt)

1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 211 (2 cases) RSA-3214-2000 (O&M) Date of Decision:-25.05.2026 Smt. Lalita Nagpal ……Appellant Versus Jawaharlal and others ..……Respondents RSA-4315-2000 (O&M) Punjab Urban, Planning Development ……Appellant Versus Jawahar Lal ..……Respondent CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE AMARINDER SINGH GREWAL **** Present: None for the appellant(s) in both cases. Mr. Himanshu Raj, AAG Punjab. For respondents No.7 and 8 in RSA-3214-2000 & for respondents No.5 and 6 in RSA-4315-2000. Mr. Ashish Grover, Advocate, for respondent No.5 in RSA-3214-2000. **** AMARINDER SINGH GREWAL, J. (Oral) 1. There has been no representation on behalf of the appellant in RSA-3214-2000 for the last three consecutive dates. However, learned counsel for the appellant in RSA-4315-2000 had appeared on the previous two dates, but did not advance any arguments. Today also, despite due intimation, no one has put in appearance on behalf of the appellants in either of the appeals. ANIL KUMAR 2026.05.29 14:32 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document 2 2. In view of the above, and considering the fact that the present appeals pertain to the year 2000, no useful pur

https://niyam.ai/judgements/high-court/2026/may/smt-lalita-nagpal-vs-jawaharlal