# SML ISUZU LIMITED vs REGIONAL PROVIDENT FUND COMMISSIONER AND ORS.

Court: Punjab and Haryana High Court
Date: 2026-05-27
Citation: IOIN 1-CWP-20554/2017
Petitioner: SML ISUZU LIMITED
Respondent: REGIONAL PROVIDENT FUND COMMISSIONER AND ORS.

[Official PDF on Punjab and Haryana High Court website](https://livedb9010.phhc.gov.in/public/judgments/order-pdf?case_type=IOIN&case_no=1-CWP-20554&case_year=2017&order_date=2026-05-27&order_type=FINAL)

## Judgment text (excerpt)

206 IOIN-1-CWP-20554-2017 SML ISUZU LIMITED VS REGIONAL PROVIDENT FUND COMMISSIONER AND ORS. Present: Ms. Krati Singh, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. Sanjay Tangri, Advocate, for respondent No.1. shoe K As per office report, respondents No.4 and 6 could not be served for want of process fee. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that she will do the needful within 15 days from today. On doing so, let fresh notice to respondents No.4 and 6 be issued. IOIN stands disposed of accordingly. (KULDEEP TIWARI) JUDGE 27.05.2026 deepak DEEPAK KUMAR, 2026.05.29 10:59 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document P & H High Court, Chandigarh

https://niyam.ai/judgements/high-court/2026/may/sml-isuzu-limited-vs-regional-provident-fund-commissioner-and-ors