# SHAYAMA vs SATISH AND OTHERS

Court: Punjab and Haryana High Court
Date: 2026-05-25
Citation: CR 4422/2026
Petitioner: SHAYAMA
Respondent: SATISH AND OTHERS

[Official PDF on Punjab and Haryana High Court website](https://livedb9010.phhc.gov.in/public/judgments/order-pdf?case_type=CR&case_no=4422&case_year=2026&order_date=2026-05-25&order_type=FINAL)

## Judgment text (excerpt)

128 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CR No.4422 of 2026 (O&M) Date of Decision:-25.05.2026 Shyama …..Petitioner. Versus Satish and others .....Respondents. CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE VIKRAM AGGARWAL ***** Present:- Mr. Sumit S. Bairagi, Advocate for the petitioner. VIKRAM AGGARWAL, J. (ORAL) The instant revision petition, preferred under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, assails the order dated 13.05.2026 (Annexure P-7) passed by the Court of Civil Judge (Junior Division), Faridabad, vide which the application filed by respondent-defendant No.1 for appointment of a handwriting expert was allowed. 2. The facts, as emanating from the revision petition, are that a suit (Annexure P-1) for permanent and mandatory injunction was instituted by the petitioner-plaintiff (Shyama) against the respondent-defendant (Satish) praying for the following relief:- “It is, therefore, prayed that a decree for permanent/ prohibitory injunction restraining the defendant from raising construction thereupon or in any other manner upon the suit property be passed in favour of the plaintiff and against the YAG DUTT 2026.05.27 17:19 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this 

https://niyam.ai/judgements/high-court/2026/may/shayama-vs-satish-and-others