# SANJEEV BANSAL vs STATE OF NCT OF DELHI & ANR.

Court: Delhi High Court
Date: 2026-05-16
Citation: CRL.M.C.-1844/2026 2026:DHC:4385
Petitioner: SANJEEV BANSAL
Respondent: STATE OF NCT OF DELHI & ANR.

[Official PDF on Delhi High Court website](https://delhihighcourt.nic.in/app/showFileJudgment/60816052026CRLMM18442026_183225.pdf)

## Judgment text (excerpt)

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision: 16.05.2026 CRL.M.C. 1844/2026 & CRL.M.A. 7590/2026 SANJEEV BANSAL .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Aryan Bhardwaj, Advocate. versus STATE OF NCT OF DELHI & ANR. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Satish Kumar, APP for State with SI Kapil Beniwal and SI Vikram Singh. CORAM: JUSTICE GIRISH KATHPALIA J U D G M E N T (ORAL) 1. Petitioner seeks quashing of case FIR No. 376/2016 of Police Station Punjabi Bagh, Delhi for offence under Section 354/506/509 IPC on the ground that the complainant de facto (respondent no. 2) has compromised the disputes with the petitioner. 2. State has no objection to this petition. Statements of parties have already been recorded by the concerned Joint Registrar. CRL.M.C. 1844/2026 pages 2.5.4.20=8401dd889b27a77b2f65ffffe4afe c45569af3962c6fb4835d435f97626cacca, ou=HIGH COURT OF DELHI,CID - 7047638, KATHPALIA postalCode=110003, st=Delhi, serialNumber=d3e86796451ec45c07b5d1 5570996b40f80cbd2eee60402c487965ff80 1e26fa, cn=GIRISH KATHPALIA 3. The respondent no.2, present through videoconferencing, is identified by IO/SI Vikram Singh. I have spoken with respondent no.2 in Hindi and it is stated by her that she has

https://niyam.ai/judgements/high-court/2026/may/sanjeev-bansal-vs-state-of-nct-of-delhi-anr