# RITU SALARIA vs NEELAM SHARMA

Court: Punjab and Haryana High Court
Date: 2026-05-25
Citation: RA-CR 79/2026
Petitioner: RITU SALARIA
Respondent: NEELAM SHARMA

[Official PDF on Punjab and Haryana High Court website](https://livedb9010.phhc.gov.in/public/judgments/order-pdf?case_type=RA-CR&case_no=79&case_year=2026&order_date=2026-05-25&order_type=FINAL)

## Judgment text (excerpt)

-1- 134 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH RA-CR-79-2026 IN CR-3256-2026 Date of Decision:25.05.2026 RITU SALARIA ...PETITIONER Versus NEELAM SHARMA ...RESPONDENT CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PARMOD GOYAL Present: Mr. Pradeep Virk, Senior Advocate with Mr. Kamal Jindal, Advocate Mr. Ajay Sharma, Advocate Mr. Amandeep Punia, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Preetwinder Singh Dhaliwal, Advocate for respondent/applicant. PARMOD GOYAL, J. (ORAL) Present review application has been preferred by the respondent-applicant under Article 227 of the Constitution of India read with Section 114 and Order XLVII Rule 1 CPC, 1908 for recalling/review of the order dated 17.04.2026 passed by this Court in CR No.3256-2026. 2. Present civil revision petition bearing CR No.3256-2026 was preferred by petitioner-defendant being aggrieved by order dated 28.01.2026 (Annexure P-1) whereby her defence evidence was closed. This Court after considering facts and circumstances of the present case found that though petitioner-defendant had availed five opportunities and had not led any evidence but concluded that in the present case procedure should not be allowed to overwrite substantive justic

https://niyam.ai/judgements/high-court/2026/may/ritu-salaria-vs-neelam-sharma