# RENU BALA AND ANOTHER vs PRITPAL SINGH

Court: Punjab and Haryana High Court
Date: 2026-05-22
Citation: FAO 3852/2025
Petitioner: RENU BALA AND ANOTHER
Respondent: PRITPAL SINGH

[Official PDF on Punjab and Haryana High Court website](https://livedb9010.phhc.gov.in/public/judgments/order-pdf?case_type=FAO&case_no=3852&case_year=2025&order_date=2026-05-22&order_type=FINAL)

## Judgment text (excerpt)

225 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH FAO-3852-2025 (O&M) Date of decision: 22.05.2026 Renu Bala and another ...Appellants Versus Pritpal Singh ...Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIKAS BAHL Present: None. **** VIKAS BAHL, J. (ORAL) 1. As per report of the Registry, notice could not be issued to the respondent for want of process fee. 2. None has appeared on behalf of the appellants to inform the Court as to whether they wish to pursue the present appeal or not. 3. Accordingly, the main appeal is disposed of with liberty to the appellants to revive the same in case they want to pursue the present case or in case any cause survives. 22.05.2026 (VIKAS BAHL) Pawan JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned:- Yes/No Whether reportable:- Yes/No PAWAN KUMAR 2026.05.22 16:18 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document

https://niyam.ai/judgements/high-court/2026/may/renu-bala-and-another-vs-pritpal-singh