# RATNESH KUMAR & ORS. vs THE STATE (NCT OF DELHI) & ANR.

Court: Delhi High Court
Date: 2026-05-25
Citation: CRL.M.C.-4155/2026 2026:DHC:4710
Petitioner: RATNESH KUMAR & ORS.
Respondent: THE STATE (NCT OF DELHI) & ANR.

[Official PDF on Delhi High Court website](https://delhihighcourt.nic.in/app/showFileJudgment/60825052026CRLMM41552026_171953.pdf)

## Judgment text (excerpt)

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision: 25.05.2026 CRL.M.C. 4155/2026 & CRL.M.A. 16782/2026 RATNESH KUMAR & ORS. .....Petitioners Through: Ms. Sukanya Hazarika and Mr. Shiv Kumar, Advocates. versus THE STATE (NCT OF DELHI) & ANR. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Amit Ahlawat, APP for State with SI Mohit Malik, PS Vijay Vihar. Respondent no.2 in person. CORAM: JUSTICE GIRISH KATHPALIA J U D G M E N T (ORAL) 1. Petitioners seek quashing of case FIR No. 251/2024 of PS Vijay Vihar for offence under Section 498A/406/34 IPC on the ground that the complainant de facto (respondent no.2) has compromised the disputes with the petitioners 2. Learned APP for State assisted by IO/SI Mohit Malik accepts notice and submits that State has no objection to this petition. CRL.M.C. 4155/2026 pages 2.5.4.20=8401dd889b27a77b2f65ffffe4af ec45569af3962c6fb4835d435f97626cacc a, ou=HIGH COURT OF DELHI,CID - KATHPALIA 7047638, postalCode=110003, st=Delhi, serialNumber=d3e86796451ec45c07b5d 15570996b40f80cbd2eee60402c487965f 3. The respondent no.2 is present in court today and is identified by the IO. 4. I have spoken with respondent no.2 in Hindi and it is stated by her that she has compromise

https://niyam.ai/judgements/high-court/2026/may/ratnesh-kumar-ors-vs-the-state-nct-of-delhi-anr