# RANDHIR SINGH vs VAKIL RAM

Court: Punjab and Haryana High Court
Date: 2026-05-29
Citation: CRR 2802/2016
Petitioner: RANDHIR SINGH
Respondent: VAKIL RAM

[Official PDF on Punjab and Haryana High Court website](https://livedb9010.phhc.gov.in/public/judgments/order-pdf?case_type=CRR&case_no=2802&case_year=2016&order_date=2026-05-29&order_type=FINAL)

## Judgment text (excerpt)

CRR-2802-2016 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 211 CRR-2802-2016 Date of Decision: 29.05.2026 RANDHIR SINGH ......... Pe''oner Versus VAKIL RAM ......... Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANOOP CHITKARA Present None for the pe oner. Mr. Raj Kapoor Malik, Advocate for the respondent. **** ANOOP CHITKARA, J. (ORAL) 1. Counsel for the respondent submits that, as per his instruc ons, both the pe oner as well as respondent No. 2 have expired. 2. Today, none has appeared on behalf of the pe oner. It appears the pe oner is no more interested to pursue the present pe on. 3. Given above, the present pe on stands dismissed for non-prosecu on. The bail bonds are rendered infructuous and the personal bonds and surety bonds, if any, furnished by the pe oner stand discharged. All pending miscellaneous applica ons, if any, stand disposed of. (ANOOP CHITKARA) JUDGE 29.05.2026 Jyo-II Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether Reportable Yes/No JYOTI 2026.05.29 17:27 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment.

https://niyam.ai/judgements/high-court/2026/may/randhir-singh-vs-vakil-ram