# RAKESH KUMAR vs STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS

Court: Punjab and Haryana High Court
Date: 2026-05-29
Citation: CRM-M 31440/2026
Petitioner: RAKESH KUMAR
Respondent: STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS

[Official PDF on Punjab and Haryana High Court website](https://livedb9010.phhc.gov.in/public/judgments/order-pdf?case_type=CRM-M&case_no=31440&case_year=2026&order_date=2026-05-29&order_type=FINAL)

## Judgment text (excerpt)

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 149 CRM-M--31440-2026(O&M) Date of decision: 29.05.2026 Rakesh Kumar ...Petitioner(s) VERSUS State of Haryana and others ...Respondent(s) CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD S. BHARDWAJ Present :- Mr. Nitish Kumar, Advocate for Mr. J.S. Saneta,, Advocate for the petitioner. ***** VINOD S. BHARDWAJ, J. (Oral) The present petition has been filed seeking directions to respondent No. 4 not to interfere in the free plying of the vehicle of the petitioner bearing registration No.HR-45-E-5960 in view of the judgment of Hon’ble Supreme Court of India passed in the matter of Manager, ICICI Bank Ltd., Vs. Prakash Kaur and others reported as 2007(2) R.C.R. (Criminal) 76 and in the matter of ICICI Bank Vs. Shanti Devi Sharma and others reported as 2008(3) R.C.R. (Criminal) 463. 2. After arguing the matter at some length, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner seeks withdrawal of the present petition. 3. In view of the above, the present petition is disposed of as withdrawn. 4. Pending application(s), if any, shall stand disposed of. (VINOD S. BHARDWAJ) 29.05.2026 JUDGE Sumit Gusain Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No Whether repor

https://niyam.ai/judgements/high-court/2026/may/rakesh-kumar-vs-state-of-haryana-and-others