# RAJESHWAR DAYAL AGGARWAL vs M/S ENICAR MACHINE (INDIA)

Court: Delhi High Court
Date: 2026-05-11
Citation: W.P.(C)-9849/2016 2026:DHC:4118
Petitioner: RAJESHWAR DAYAL AGGARWAL
Respondent: M/S ENICAR MACHINE (INDIA)

[Official PDF on Delhi High Court website](https://delhihighcourt.nic.in/app/showFileJudgment/75411052026CW98492016_150845.pdf)

## Judgment text (excerpt)

$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on: 12.02.2026 Date of decision: 11.05.2026 Uploaded on: 11.05.2026 W.P.(C) 9849/2016 RAJESHWAR DAYAL AGGARWAL .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Triloki Pandit, Adv. versus M/S ENICAR MACHINE (INDIA) .....Respondent Through: Ms. Diya Kapur, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Aditya Ladha, Mr. Naibedya Dash, Advs. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE SHAIL JAIN JUDGMENT SHAIL JAIN, J. 1. The present writ petition has been filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India by the Petitioner/workman assailing the Award dated 03.07.2015 passed by the learned Presiding Officer, Labour Court-XIX, Karkardooma Courts, Delhi in LIR No. 30/2012, whereby the learned Labour Court held that the Government of NCT of Delhi was not the “appropriate Government” for making the reference and consequently held the claim of the Petitioner/workman to be not maintainable before the Labour Court at Delhi. 2. Brief facts emerging from the record, necessary for adjudication of the present writ petition, are that the Petitioner/workman claimed to have joined the services of the Respondent/management on 20.11.1978 as a Clerk/Sale Purchase Assistant and alleged that he had continuously 

https://niyam.ai/judgements/high-court/2026/may/rajeshwar-dayal-aggarwal-vs-m-s-enicar-machine-india