# PAWAN @ PONY vs STATE OF HARYANA AND ANOTHER

Court: Punjab and Haryana High Court
Date: 2026-05-22
Citation: CRA-S 3865/2025
Petitioner: PAWAN @ PONY
Respondent: STATE OF HARYANA AND ANOTHER

[Official PDF on Punjab and Haryana High Court website](https://livedb9010.phhc.gov.in/public/judgments/order-pdf?case_type=CRA-S&case_no=3865&case_year=2025&order_date=2026-05-22&order_type=FINAL)

## Judgment text (excerpt)

101-2 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRA-S-3865-2025 (O&M) DECIDED ON: 22.05.2026 PAWAN @ PONY .....APPELLANT VERSUS STATE OF HARYANA AND ANOTHER .....RESPONDENTS CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY VASHISTH. Present: Mr. Prashant Sethi, Advocate, for the appellant. Mr. Parveen Kumar Aggarwal, Addl. AG, Haryana. Mr. Lalit K. Narang, Advocate, for respondent No.2/complainant. SANJAY VASHISTH, J (ORAL) 1. Present appeal has been filed by the appellant, challenging the order dated 09.12.2025 passed by learned Additional Sessions Judge, Rohtak, whereby anticipatory bail petition filed by him, in FIR No.377 dated 04.11.2025, registered under Sections 190, 191(1), 115(2), 351(3), 333 of BNS, 2023, and Sections 3(1)(B), 3(1)(S), 3(2)(VA) of the Scheduled Castes and the Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989, at Police Station Meham, District Rohtak, has been dismissed. 2. After hearing the submissions addressed by counsel for the appellant, on 11.12.2025, following order was passed:- “1. xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx 2. Learned counsel for the appellant, inter alia, contends that in the present case, the specific accusation pertains only to co-accused Vijay, and 

https://niyam.ai/judgements/high-court/2026/may/pawan-pony-vs-state-of-haryana-and-another