# NAZIMA & ANR. vs IKRAR KHAN & ANR.

Court: Delhi High Court
Date: 2026-05-18
Citation: CM(M)-180/2025 2026:DHC:4434
Petitioner: NAZIMA & ANR.
Respondent: IKRAR KHAN & ANR.

[Official PDF on Delhi High Court website](https://delhihighcourt.nic.in/app/showFileJudgment/68918052026CMM1802025_125003.pdf)

## Judgment text (excerpt)

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:18thMay, 2026 CM(M) 180/2025, CM APPL. 5446/2025, CM APPL. 8128/2026 & CM APPL. 8129/2026 NAZIMA & ANR. .....Petitioners Through: Mr. Prakash Khandelwal and Mr. Vinod Kumar, Advocates. versus IKRAR KHAN & ANR. .....Respondents Through: Ms. Harita Mehta, Adv. For R-2. (through VC) CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJNEESH KUMAR GUPTA ORDER (Oral) Rajneesh Kumar Gupta, J. 1. This hearing has been conducted through hybrid mode. 2. The present petition has been filed by the petitioners/ defendant nos. 1 and 2 under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, seeking setting aside of the order dated 25th November, 2024, passed by the learned Trial Court in Civ. Suit No. 253/2019, whereby no opportunity has been granted to the petitioners to cross-examine DW-3. 3. Heard. Record perused. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioners has argued that DW-3 has been summoned as a court witness, and the petitioners being the defendants have a right to cross-examine the said witness. It is further argued that DW-3 has been summoned not only for producing the documents but also for CM(M) 180/2025 5. Per contra, learned counsel for respondent no. 2 has ar

https://niyam.ai/judgements/high-court/2026/may/nazima-anr-vs-ikrar-khan-anr