# MUKESH KHURANA vs RAHUL CHAUDHARY

Court: Delhi High Court
Date: 2026-05-21
Citation: TR.P.(C.)-50/2025 2026:DHC:4566
Petitioner: MUKESH KHURANA
Respondent: RAHUL CHAUDHARY

[Official PDF on Delhi High Court website](https://delhihighcourt.nic.in/app/showFileJudgment/59821052026TPC502025_170153.pdf)

## Judgment text (excerpt)

$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on: 15th April, 2026 Pronounced on: 21st May, 2026 TR.P.(C.) 50/2025 & CM APPL. 19171/2025 MUKESH KHURANA .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Akshat Gupta, Ms. Sakshi Tikmany and Mr. Madhav Aggarwal, Advocates. versus RAHUL CHAUDHARY .....Respondent Through: Mr. Lalit Gupta, Mr. Vikram Singh Dalal, Ms. Ishita Nautiyal, Mr. Satvik Sharma and Ms. Pooja Sharma, Advocates. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT SHARMA JUDGMENT AMIT SHARMA, J. 1. The present petition under Section 24 of the Civil Procedure Code, 1908, (for short, ‘CPC’) seeks the following prayers: - “A. Direct that the Suit bearing CS No. 523 of 2022 titled “Rahul Chaudhary v. Mukesh Khurana” be transferred from the court of the Ld. Additional District Judge-03, Patiala House Courts, New Delhi, to the Original Side of this Hon’ble Court; and B. Any other order(s) that this Hon’ble Court may deem fit and necessary in the interest of justice.” 2. By way of the present petition, petitioner seeks transfer of the subject 3. As per the averments made in the present petition, the petitioner had preferred an application under Section 8 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, (for 

https://niyam.ai/judgements/high-court/2026/may/mukesh-khurana-vs-rahul-chaudhary