# MUKESH AGGARWAL vs STATE OF HARYANA AND ANOTHER

Court: Punjab and Haryana High Court
Date: 2026-05-27
Citation: CWP 31958/2019
Petitioner: MUKESH AGGARWAL
Respondent: STATE OF HARYANA AND ANOTHER

[Official PDF on Punjab and Haryana High Court website](https://livedb9010.phhc.gov.in/public/judgments/order-pdf?case_type=CWP&case_no=31958&case_year=2019&order_date=2026-05-27&order_type=FINAL)

## Judgment text (excerpt)

CWP-31958-2019 -1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH (101) CWP-31958-2019 Date of decision:- 27.05.2026 Mukesh Aggarwal ... Petitioner Versus State of Haryana and another ... Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUVIR SEHGAL HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE VIKAS SURI Present:- Mr. Shreenath A. Khemka, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Deepak Bhardwaj, Addl. A.G., Haryana for the respondents **** SUVIR SEHGAL, J. (ORAL) 1. Mr. Khemka has placed on record a copy of order dated 08.02.2024 passed by the Judicial Magistrate, Shahabad, District Kurukshetra to submit that petitioner has been acquitted in FIR No.258 dated 08.09.2012 lodged for offence under Sections 7 (1) and 12 of Punjab Scheduled Road and Controlled Area, Restriction of Unregulated Development Act, 1963. He states that in so far as challenge to Annexure P-12 is concerned, writ petition has become infructuous. 2. Mr. Khemka points out that petitioner is also aggrieved by communication dated 03.04.2018, Annexure P-14, although, it has not been specifically challenged in the writ petition. He submits that by virtue of this KAMAL SHARMA 2026.05.30 14:34 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment.

https://niyam.ai/judgements/high-court/2026/may/mukesh-aggarwal-vs-state-of-haryana-and-another
