# MOHINDER SINGH vs HARYANA URBAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY (HUDA) NOW HARYANA SHEHR VIKAS PRADHIKARAN (HSVP)

Court: Punjab and Haryana High Court
Date: 2026-05-22
Citation: ARB 249/2026
Petitioner: MOHINDER SINGH
Respondent: HARYANA URBAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY (HUDA) NOW HARYANA SHEHR VIKAS PRADHIKARAN (HSVP)

[Official PDF on Punjab and Haryana High Court website](https://livedb9010.phhc.gov.in/public/judgments/order-pdf?case_type=ARB&case_no=249&case_year=2026&order_date=2026-05-22&order_type=FINAL)

## Judgment text (excerpt)

ARB-249-2026 (O&M) -1- 113 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH *** ARB-249-2026 (O&M) Date of Decision: 22.05.2026 Mohinder Singh, Contractor .... Applicant Versus Haryana Urban Development Authority (HUDA) now Haryana Shehri Vikas Pradhikaran (HSVP) ..... Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JASGURPREET SINGH PURI Present: Mr. Pulkit Goyal, Advocate, for the applicant. **** JASGURPREET SINGH PURI, J. (ORAL) 1. The present application has been filed under Section 11 read with Sections 14 & 15 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (hereinafter referred to as ‘the Act’) praying for appointment of an independent Sole Arbitrator to adjudicate upon the disputes and differences which have arisen between the parties. 2. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the applicant, while giving the facts of the present case, submitted that when a dispute arose between the parties, an Arbitrator was appointed on 06.05.2014 pursuant to the arbitration clause i.e. Clause 25(A)(ii) in the Tender Notice. The said clause provides that all disputes or differences in respect of which the decision is not final and conclusive shall, at the request in writing, of either party, made b

https://niyam.ai/judgements/high-court/2026/may/mohinder-singh-vs-haryana-urban-development-authority-huda-now-haryana-shehr-vikas-pradhikaran-hsvp