# JAI NATH YADAV & ANR. vs SOMNATH YADAV @ SHOBH NATH YADAV & ANR.

Court: Delhi High Court
Date: 2026-05-08
Citation: RFA(COMM)-678/2025 2026:DHC:4068-DB
Petitioner: JAI NATH YADAV & ANR.
Respondent: SOMNATH YADAV @ SHOBH NATH YADAV & ANR.

[Official PDF on Delhi High Court website](https://delhihighcourt.nic.in/app/showFileJudgment/58908052026RFAC6782025_182733.pdf)

## Judgment text (excerpt)

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision : 08.05.2026 RFA(COMM) 678/2025 JAI NATH YADAV & ANR. .....APPELLANTS Through: Mr. D.B. Yadav, Mr. Sauraj Yadav and Mr. Satyavijay Yadav, Advs. versus SOMNATH YADAV @ SHOBH NATH YADAV & ANR. .....RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. R.N. Dubey and Mr. Himanshu, Advs. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V. KAMESWAR RAO HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MANMEET PRITAM SINGH ARORA MANMEET PRITAM SINGH ARORA, J. (ORAL) CM APPL. 31071/2026 (for exemption) 1. Allowed, subject to just exceptions. 2. The application is disposed of. RFA(COMM) 678/2025, REVIEW PET. 211/2026 and CM APPL. 31070/2026 3. This petition has been filed by the appellant under Section 114, read with order XLVII Rule 1 and Section 151 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, seeking review of the judgment dated 24.03.2026 [the ‘impugned judgment’]. 4. This Court vide the impugned judgment had upheld the Trial Court’s findings in its judgment dated 13.10.2025, that the Petitioner (i.e., 5. Having perused the grounds raised in the review petition, it is evident that the Appellant seeks a re-hearing of the matter on the merits under the guise of review. The grounds raised essentially seek a re-apprecia

https://niyam.ai/judgements/high-court/2026/may/jai-nath-yadav-anr-vs-somnath-yadav-shobh-nath-yadav-anr