# HASIN KHAN vs STATE OF HARYANA

Court: Punjab and Haryana High Court
Date: 2026-05-22
Citation: CRM-M 15675/2026
Petitioner: HASIN KHAN
Respondent: STATE OF HARYANA

[Official PDF on Punjab and Haryana High Court website](https://livedb9010.phhc.gov.in/public/judgments/order-pdf?case_type=CRM-M&case_no=15675&case_year=2026&order_date=2026-05-22&order_type=FINAL)

## Judgment text (excerpt)

CRM-M-15675-2026 (O&M) 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Sr.No.117+217 CRM-M-22824-2026 in/and CRM-M-15675-2026 Decided on : 22.05.2026 Hasin Khan ...... Petitioner Versus State of Haryana ...... Respondent CORAM : HON’BLE MS. JUSTICE RUPINDERJIT CHAHAL *** Present : Mr. Ravi Ambawata, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Mohit Chaudhary, AAG, Haryana for the respondent-State. *** RUPINDERJIT CHAHAL, J (ORAL) CRM-22824-2026 Through this application, a prayer has been made to amend the prayer clause of the main petition as under:- “This First Petition under Section 483 of the Bhartiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 023 with a prayer for granting of regular bail in pending trial to the petitioner in case FIR No.: 167 dated 23.08.2025, under Sections: 318(4), 319(2), 336(3), 338, 340 (2), 241 of BNS, 2023 and Section 42(3)(E) of the Telecommunication Act, 2023, Police Station : Cyber Crime, Nuh.” Heard. MAMTA MALHOTRA 2026.05.22 19:35 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment Chandigarh CRM-M-15675-2026 (O&M) 2 For the reasons, mentioned in the application, the same is allowed. Registry is directed to make necessary correction/addition in the prayer

https://niyam.ai/judgements/high-court/2026/may/hasin-khan-vs-state-of-haryana