# HARPREET SINGH vs SUKHWINDER SINGH AND OTHERS

Court: Punjab and Haryana High Court
Date: 2026-05-21
Citation: CR 4269/2026
Petitioner: HARPREET SINGH
Respondent: SUKHWINDER SINGH AND OTHERS

[Official PDF on Punjab and Haryana High Court website](https://livedb9010.phhc.gov.in/public/judgments/order-pdf?case_type=CR&case_no=4269&case_year=2026&order_date=2026-05-21&order_type=FINAL)

## Judgment text (excerpt)

-1- 131 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CR-4269-2026 Date of Decision:21.05.2026 HARPREET SINGH ...Petitioner Versus SUKHWINDER SINGH AND OTHERS ...Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PARMOD GOYAL Present: Mr. Anupam Mathur, Advocate for the petitioner. PARMOD GOYAL, J. (ORAL) Present revision petition has been preferred under Article 227 of the Constitution of India by the petitioner-defendant being aggrieved by order dated 05.05.2026 (Annexure P-5) passed in CMA-41-2026 by learned District Judge, Fatehgarh Sahib. 2. It is the case of petitioner-defendant that no appeal against order passed by learned Court of First Instance whereby relief of ex parte ad- interim injunction was declined is maintainable. However, learned Court vide order dated 05.05.2026 had not only entertained the appeal but had also restrained petitioner-defendant from interfering into the peaceful possession of the respondent No.1-plaintiff till next date of hearing. The next date before learned Court below is fixed as 26.05.2026. 3. I do not find any reasons justifying filing of present revision petition. If the learned District Judge, Fatehgarh Sahib had no jurisdiction, the only reme

https://niyam.ai/judgements/high-court/2026/may/harpreet-singh-vs-sukhwinder-singh-and-others