# HARPAL SINGH vs BACHAN SINGH

Court: Punjab and Haryana High Court
Date: 2026-05-29
Citation: RSA 1090/1995
Petitioner: HARPAL SINGH
Respondent: BACHAN SINGH

[Official PDF on Punjab and Haryana High Court website](https://livedb9010.phhc.gov.in/public/judgments/order-pdf?case_type=RSA&case_no=1090&case_year=1995&order_date=2026-05-29&order_type=FINAL)

## Judgment text (excerpt)

RSA-1090-1995 (O&M) 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH (102) RSA-1090-1995 (O&M) Reserved on :-21.05.2026 Date of Pronouncement:-29.05.2026 Uploaded on:- 29.05.2026 HARPAL SINGH ….Appellant Vs BACHAN SINGH (SINCE DECEASED) THROUGH LRS AND OTHERS ...Respondents CORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIRINDER AGGARWAL Present: Mr. M.L. Saggar, Senior Advocate, with Mr. Rehaan Singh, Advocate and Ms. Armaan Saggar, Advocate for the appellant. Mr. Baltej Singh Sidhu, Senior Advocate, with Mr. Himmat Singh Sidhu, Advocate and Ms. Mohabat Sandhu, Advocate, for respondent No.3. VIRINDER AGGARWAL, J. (Oral) 1. The present Regular Second Appeal (hereinafter referred to as “RSA”) has been instituted by the appellant–plaintiff assailing the decree and judgment dated 25.03.1995 passed by the learned District Judge, Faridkot, whereby the findings recorded by the learned trial Court came to be affirmed in toto. The learned Sub-Judge Ist Class, Muktsar, vide decree and judgment dated 03.06.1991, had dismissed the suit instituted by the plaintiff seeking a decree of permanent injunction. Aggrieved by the concurrent findings returned by both the Courts below, the appellant has approached 

https://niyam.ai/judgements/high-court/2026/may/harpal-singh-vs-bachan-singh
