# HARDEEP SINGH vs STATE OF UT CHANDIGARH AND ANOTHER

Court: Punjab and Haryana High Court
Date: 2026-05-27
Citation: CRM-M 13964/2026
Petitioner: HARDEEP SINGH
Respondent: STATE OF UT CHANDIGARH AND ANOTHER

[Official PDF on Punjab and Haryana High Court website](https://livedb9010.phhc.gov.in/public/judgments/order-pdf?case_type=CRM-M&case_no=13964&case_year=2026&order_date=2026-05-27&order_type=FINAL)

## Judgment text (excerpt)

CRM-M-13964-2026 (O&M) 1 301 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M-13964-2026 (O&M) DECIDED ON: 27.05.2026 HARDEEP SINGH .....PETITIONER VERSUS STATE OF UT CHANDIGARH AND ANOTHER .....RESPONDENTS CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MANDEEP PANNU Present: Mr. Shubhnit Hans, Advocate and Mr. Anjanpreet Singh, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Vipin Pal Yadav, Additional Public Prosecutor for U.T. Chandigarh. Mr. Ranwant Singh Sangha, Advocate for respondent No.2. MANDEEP PANNU, J (ORAL) 1. This is a petition under Section 528 B.N.S.S. (Section 482 Cr.P.C) for quashing of FIR No.13, dated 17.02.2021, under Sections 420, 467, 468 and 471 (corresponding to Sections 318, 338, 336 and 340 of BNS, 2023), got registered at Police Station Sector 3 (North), Chandigarh, and all the subsequent proceedings arising there from, on account of compromise dated 29.09.2025 (Annexure P-2). 2. During the pendency of the dispute, the parties have compromised the matter and filed the present petition for quashing of FIR. HIMANSHU 2026.05.27 17:56 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CRM-M-13964-2026 (O&M) 2 3. Vide order dated 13.03.2026, parties were directed to appear befo

https://niyam.ai/judgements/high-court/2026/may/hardeep-singh-vs-state-of-ut-chandigarh-and-another