# HARBANSO ETC. vs STATE OF PUNJAB ETC.

Court: Punjab and Haryana High Court
Date: 2026-05-26
Citation: CRR 1942/2008
Petitioner: HARBANSO ETC.
Respondent: STATE OF PUNJAB ETC.

[Official PDF on Punjab and Haryana High Court website](https://livedb9010.phhc.gov.in/public/judgments/order-pdf?case_type=CRR&case_no=1942&case_year=2008&order_date=2026-05-26&order_type=FINAL)

## Judgment text (excerpt)

CRR-1942-2008 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 202/1 CRR-1942-2008 (O&M) Date of Decision: 26.05.2026 Harbanso and another .....Petitioners Versus State of Punjab and others .....Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAMESH CHANDER DIMRI Present: None for the petitioner. Mr. Aman Dhir, DAG, Punjab. Mr. Amandeep Singh Manaise, Advocate for respondent No.4. **** RAMESH CHANDER DIMRI, J.(Oral) 1. Registry has reported that the petitioner No.2 has been intimated by his granddaughter to have expired and respondents No.2 and 3 have also expired. The death certificates of respondents No.2 and 3 have been attached with the file. As per it, respondent No.2-Rajinder Singh expired on 13.12.2023 whereas respondent No.3-Kashmir Singh expired on 09.01.2025. The respondent No.4-Satnam Singh, as is evident from the judgments passed by the Courts concerned, was declared as a proclaimed offender and was not convicted by the impugned judgment/s and order of sentence. 2. In view thereof, the present petition qua respondent No.4- Satnam Singh was/is not maintainable. Therefore, for the purpose of law, the present petition has to be treated as a petition against the respondents No.

https://niyam.ai/judgements/high-court/2026/may/harbanso-etc-vs-state-of-punjab-etc