# GURMAIL SINGH vs MAMTA JOSHI AND ANOTHER

Court: Punjab and Haryana High Court
Date: 2026-05-22
Citation: CR 4251/2026
Petitioner: GURMAIL SINGH
Respondent: MAMTA JOSHI AND ANOTHER

[Official PDF on Punjab and Haryana High Court website](https://livedb9010.phhc.gov.in/public/judgments/order-pdf?case_type=CR&case_no=4251&case_year=2026&order_date=2026-05-22&order_type=FINAL)

## Judgment text (excerpt)

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CR-4251-2026 (O&M) Date of Decision: 22.05.2026 Gurmail Singh …Petitioner V/s Mamta Joshi and another …Respondents CORAM : HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE VIKRAM AGGARWAL Present: Mr. Rajiv Joshi, Advocate, for the petitioner. *** VIKRAM AGGARWAL, J (ORAL) The instant revision petition, preferred under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, assails the order dated 21.04.2026 passed by the Court of Additional Civil Judge (Jr. Divn.), Phillaur, vide which the application for additional evidence moved by the respondents-plaintiffs was allowed. 2. The facts, as emanating from the revision petition, are that a suit (Annexure P-1) for possession was filed by the respondents-plaintiffs as regards property (fully described in the plaint), measuring 10 marlas, situated in Village Kotli, Khakhian, Tehsil Phillaur, District Jalandhar (hereinafter referred to as “the suit property”). The suit was opposed by way of a written statement Annexure P-2. 4. During the course of the trial, an application (Annexure P-3) was moved by the respondents-plaintiffs for appointment of a revenue official as a local commissioner for demarcation of Khasra No.423. The 

https://niyam.ai/judgements/high-court/2026/may/gurmail-singh-vs-mamta-joshi-and-another