# GOURV @ GOLDY vs STATE THROUGH SHO PS SARITA VIHAR AND ANR

Court: Delhi High Court
Date: 2026-05-05
Citation: CRL.REV.P.-991/2024 2026:DHC:3821
Petitioner: GOURV @ GOLDY
Respondent: STATE THROUGH SHO PS SARITA VIHAR AND ANR

[Official PDF on Delhi High Court website](https://delhihighcourt.nic.in/app/showFileJudgment/59105052026CRLR9912024_180200.pdf)

## Judgment text (excerpt)

* I N T H E H I G H CO U RT O F DE L H I AT NE W DE L H I Reserved on: April 28, 2026 % Pronounced on: May 05, 2026 CRL.REV.P. 991/2024 & CM No.22656/2024 GOURV @ GOLDY …Revisionist Through: Mr. Pratap Singh, Adv. Versus STATE (NCT OF DELHI) & ANR. …Respondents Through: Mr. Satish Kumar, APP with Ms. Divya Bakshi, Mr. Aditya Vikram Singh, Mr. Gourav Singha and Ms. Upasna Bakshi, Advocates with SI Asha, PS: Savita Vihar Ms. Sunita Arora, Adv. (DHCLSC) for R-2 CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SAURABH BANERJEE JUDGMENT 1. By virtue of the present petition under Section 397 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 19731, the petitioner seeks setting aside of the order dated 23.02.20242 passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Saket Courts, Delhi3 in SC No.120/2022 arising out of FIR No.448/2021 dated 24.12.2021 registered at PS: Sarita Vihar, whereby charges have been framed 1 Hereinafter ‘CrPC’ 2 Hereinafter ‘impugned order’ 3 Hereinafter ‘Trial Court’ CRL.REV.P. 991/2024 20125. 2. Succinctly put, as per FIR, the petitioner forcefully established physical relations with the prosecutrix, a 13-year-old girl, between 01.10.2021 and 02.10.2021 between 11:00 AM to 12:00 PM, which had already b

https://niyam.ai/judgements/high-court/2026/may/gourv-goldy-vs-state-through-sho-ps-sarita-vihar-and-anr