# GAGANDEEP vs STATE OF PUNJAB

Court: Punjab and Haryana High Court
Date: 2026-05-27
Citation: CRM-M 19756/2026
Petitioner: GAGANDEEP
Respondent: STATE OF PUNJAB

[Official PDF on Punjab and Haryana High Court website](https://livedb9010.phhc.gov.in/public/judgments/order-pdf?case_type=CRM-M&case_no=19756&case_year=2026&order_date=2026-05-27&order_type=FINAL)

## Judgment text (excerpt)

CRM-M-19756-2026 (O&M) -1- & other connected case IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 240+258 Decided on: 27.05.2026 1. CRM-M-19756-2026 (O&M) GAGANDEEP …...Petitioner Versus STATE OF PUNJAB …...Respondent 2. CRM-M-29526-2026 KARANDEEP …...Petitioner Versus STATE OF PUNJAB …...Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUBHAS MEHLA Present: Mr. Sandeep Sharma, Advocate for the petitioner (in CRM-M-19756-2026). Mr. Gurminder Singh Phull, Advocate for the petitioner (in CRM-M-29526-2026). Mr. Subhash Godara, Addl. A.G., Punjab. **** SUBHAS MEHLA, J. (Oral) 1. By this common order, two petitions filed under Section 483 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (for short - ‘the BNSS’) arising out of same FIR are being adjudicated whereby the petitioners are seeking regular bail in case bearing FIR No.35 dated 25.02.2026 under SONIA PURI 2026.05.28 13:53 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CRM-M-19756-2026 (O&M) -2- & other connected case Sections 111, 61(2) and 351 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS), 2023 (for short - ‘the BNS’) and Section 25 of the Arms Act, 1959 registered at Police Station Mehtiana, Distirct Hoshiarpur. 2. Briefly stated, the p

https://niyam.ai/judgements/high-court/2026/may/gagandeep-vs-state-of-punjab