# DR ANILJIT CHILD CARE vs PERMANENT LOK ADALAT (PUBLIC UTILITY SERVICES) PATIALA AND OTHERS

Court: Punjab and Haryana High Court
Date: 2026-05-21
Citation: LPA 2588/2024
Petitioner: DR ANILJIT CHILD CARE
Respondent: PERMANENT LOK ADALAT (PUBLIC UTILITY SERVICES) PATIALA AND OTHERS

[Official PDF on Punjab and Haryana High Court website](https://livedb9010.phhc.gov.in/public/judgments/order-pdf?case_type=LPA&case_no=2588&case_year=2024&order_date=2026-05-21&order_type=FINAL)

## Judgment text (excerpt)

102+238 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CM-3591-LPA-2025 in CM-6332-LPA-2024 in/and LPA No.2588 of 2024 (O&M) Date of Decision: 21.05.2026 DR ANILJIT CHILD CARE .....Appellant Versus PERMANENT LOK ADALAT (PUBLIC UTILITY SERVICES) PATIALA AND OTHERS ........Respondents CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK MANCHANDA Present: Ms. Puja Chopra, Senior Advocate with Ms. Palak Sharma, Advocate, for the appellant. Mr. Rahul Rampal, Addl. A.G., Punjab. Mr. Sherry K.Singla, Advocate, for respondent No.2. Mr. Maheshinder Singh Sidhu, Advocate, Addl. Standing Counsel, U.T. Chandigarh and Mr. Deepak Malhotra, Addl. Panel Counsel for the respondent-UT Chandigarh. **** HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI, J. (Oral) CM-3591-LPA-2025 IN CM-6332-LPA-2024 This is an application for placing on record Annexures A-1 to A-4. For the reasons mentioned in the application, the same is allowed. Annexures A-1 to A-4 are taken on record. Main Appeal In the present appeal, challenge is to the impugned order dated 19.07.2024 passed by the learned Single Judge, whereby the appellant was SANDEEP KUMAR held liable to pay compensation to the extent of 40% to respondent

https://niyam.ai/judgements/high-court/2026/may/dr-aniljit-child-care-vs-permanent-lok-adalat-public-utility-services-patiala-and-others