# DINKU KAKKAR vs RAJPAL

Court: Delhi High Court
Date: 2026-05-08
Citation: CM(M)-89/2026 2026:DHC:4086
Petitioner: DINKU KAKKAR
Respondent: RAJPAL

[Official PDF on Delhi High Court website](https://delhihighcourt.nic.in/app/showFileJudgment/68908052026CMM892026_170638.pdf)

## Judgment text (excerpt)

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision: 08th May, 2026 CM(M) 89/2026 & CM APPL. 2219/2026 DINKU KAKKAR .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Siddharth Arora, Mr. Yash Dhyani, Mr. Gaurav Kumar and Ms. Jasleen Kaur, Advs. versus RAJPAL .....Respondent Through: Mr. Veer Singh and Mr. Arjun Singh, Advs. (through VC) CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJNEESH KUMAR GUPTA ORDER (Oral) Rajneesh Kumar Gupta, J. 1. This hearing has been conducted through hybrid mode. 2. The present petition has been filed on behalf of the petitioner/plaintiff under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, 1950, assailing the order dated 28th November, 2025 passed by the learned Trial Court in CIV DJ No. 377/2025, whereby the opportunity of the petitioner to file the replication as well as the affidavit(s) of admission/denial of documents have been closed. 3. Heard. Record perused. 4. Learned Counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is pressing only for the relief pertaining to filing of the affidavit(s) of admission/denial of documents filed on behalf of the respondent. It is submitted that the affidavit(s) could not be filed earlier as the matter has been 5. Learned Counsel for the respond

https://niyam.ai/judgements/high-court/2026/may/dinku-kakkar-vs-rajpal