# DALIP SINGH AND ORS vs STATE OF HARYANA AND ORS

Court: Punjab and Haryana High Court
Date: 2026-05-21
Citation: RFA 1019/2015
Petitioner: DALIP SINGH AND ORS
Respondent: STATE OF HARYANA AND ORS

[Official PDF on Punjab and Haryana High Court website](https://livedb9010.phhc.gov.in/public/judgments/order-pdf?case_type=RFA&case_no=1019&case_year=2015&order_date=2026-05-21&order_type=FINAL)

## Judgment text (excerpt)

1 RFA Nos.1019 of 2015 with other connected cases IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 147 RFA No.1019 of 2015 (O&M) with other connected cases Date of Decision: 20.05.2026 DALIP SINGH AND ORS. ......Appellants Vs STATE OF HARYANA AND ORS. ...Respondent(s) CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARKESH MANUJA Present: Mr. M.L. Sharma, Advocate Mr. Sushil K. Sharma, Advocate Ms. Meenakshi Sharma, Advocate Mr. Babbar Bhan, Advocate Mr. Nishant, Advocate for Mr. Amit Chaudhary, Advocate for the appellants/landowners. Mr. Abhinash Jain, D.A.G., Haryana. **** HARKESH MANUJA, J. (Oral) APPLICATIONS FOR LEADING ADDITIONAL DOCUMENTARY EVIDENCE Learned counsel for the applicants/appellants Mr. M.L. Sharma, Advocate does not press the application(s) under Order 41 Rule 27 CPC for seeking permission to lead additional documentary evidence. All the application(s) are dismissed as not pressed. Main Case(s) [1]. Vide this common order, RFA Nos.1019, 1020, 837, 838, 839, 840, 841, 842, 843, 844, 2021 and 2022 of 2015 (O&M), are being decided as the same have arisen out of common acquisition/Award involving identical facts and MOHMED ATIK 2026.05.27 17:41 I attest to the accuracy and authenti

https://niyam.ai/judgements/high-court/2026/may/dalip-singh-and-ors-vs-state-of-haryana-and-ors