# BOBBY SINGH vs STATE OF PUNJAB

Court: Punjab and Haryana High Court
Date: 2026-05-25
Citation: CRM-M 29944/2026
Petitioner: BOBBY SINGH
Respondent: STATE OF PUNJAB

[Official PDF on Punjab and Haryana High Court website](https://livedb9010.phhc.gov.in/public/judgments/order-pdf?case_type=CRM-M&case_no=29944&case_year=2026&order_date=2026-05-25&order_type=FINAL)

## Judgment text (excerpt)

CRM-M-29944-2026 (O&M) -1- 2026:PHHC:082030 seesieeaey Resor IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M-29944-2026 (O&M) Date of Decision: 25.05.2026 Bobby Singh ...Petitioner vs. State of Punjab ... Respondent Coram: Hon’ble Mr. Justice N.S.Shekhawat Present: | Mr. Aman Sorout, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. M.S. Bajwa, DAG, Punjab. 2K N.S.Shekhawat J. (Oral) 1. The petitioner has filed the present petition under Section 482 of Bharatiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, for grant of anticipatory bail in case FIR No.147 dated 20.12.2025, registered under Sections 126(2), 304(1), 112(2) of Bharatiya Nagrik Sanhita, 2023 (corresponding Sections 341, 379-A IPC) and (Section 317(2), 345(2), 345(3), 309(4), 111(2) of BNS added later on) [corresponding Sections 411, 481, 482, 392 IPC] and Sections 304(1) and 112(2) of BNS [corresponding Section 379A of IPC] were deleted, at Police Station Bajakhana, District Faridkot. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner contends that from a bare perusal of the FIR (Annexure P-1), it is apparent that the petitioner has been wrongly named and no specific role or overt act has been attributed to the petitioner. Even the offence was commi

https://niyam.ai/judgements/high-court/2026/may/bobby-singh-vs-state-of-punjab