# BIZLOAN PRIVATE LIMITED vs RAJESH KUMAR & ANR.

Court: Delhi High Court
Date: 2026-05-18
Citation: ARB.P.-412/2026 2026:DHC:4443
Petitioner: BIZLOAN PRIVATE LIMITED
Respondent: RAJESH KUMAR & ANR.

[Official PDF on Delhi High Court website](https://delhihighcourt.nic.in/app/showFileJudgment/68018052026AA4122026_150651.pdf)

## Judgment text (excerpt)

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision: 18.05.2026 ARB.P. 412/2026 BIZLOAN PRIVATE LIMITED .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Abhinav Bhatia, Ms. Sakshi Jain and Ms. Komolika Srivastava, Advocates versus RAJESH KUMAR & ANR. ....Respondents Through: None CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARISH VAIDYANATHAN SHANKAR % JUDGMENT (ORAL) HARISH VAIDYANATHAN SHANKAR, J. 1. The present Petition has been filed under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 [“Act”], seeking the appointment of a Sole Arbitrator to adjudicate the disputes inter se the parties arising out of the Facility Agreement dated 29.09.2023 [“Agreement”], read with the General Terms & Conditions. 2. Material on record indicates that the Arbitration Clause is set out as Clause 20 of the General Terms & Conditions. The same reads as follows: “20. ARBITRATION AND JURISDICTION 20.1 Any and all disputes, claims, differences arising out of or in connection with this Agreement and the Schedule/s attached hereto or the performance of this Agreement shall be settled by arbitration to be referred to a sole arbitrator to be appointed by BIZLOAN and 3. The material on record also indicates that the statutory 

https://niyam.ai/judgements/high-court/2026/may/bizloan-private-limited-vs-rajesh-kumar-anr