# BALJINDER KUMAR vs VISHRAM KUMAR MEENA, IAS, DC AND ANOTHER

Court: Punjab and Haryana High Court
Date: 2026-05-27
Citation: COCP 2279/2026
Petitioner: BALJINDER KUMAR
Respondent: VISHRAM KUMAR MEENA, IAS, DC AND ANOTHER

[Official PDF on Punjab and Haryana High Court website](https://livedb9010.phhc.gov.in/public/judgments/order-pdf?case_type=COCP&case_no=2279&case_year=2026&order_date=2026-05-27&order_type=FINAL)

## Judgment text (excerpt)

COCP-2279-2026 290 Bajinder Kumar ...... Petitioner versus Vishram Kumar Meena & anr. ..... Respondents CORAM : HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE PANKAJ JAIN *** Present :- None for the petitioner. Ms. Madhu Dayal, Addl. Standing Counsel UT, Chandigarh with Mr. Divyanshu Kaushik, Jr. Standing Counsel UT, Chandigarh. Mr. H.P.S.Ishar, Addl. A.G., Punjab. Mr. Paramjeet Singh, DAG, Haryana. *** PANKAJ JAIN, J. (ORAL) 1 On 11.05.2026 the following order was passed :- “[1] Notice of motion. [2] Mr. Panwar accepts notice on behalf of the respondents and submits that speaking order is yet to be passed. He prays for two weeks’ time to file compliance report. [3] This Court is flooded with contempt petitions alleging willful disobedience by the State officials of the orders passed by Writ Courts. [4] Writ Court(s) direct the authorities to decide representations/legal notices within a time bound period. Despite time limits stipulated in the orders, the officers seldom adhere to the same. Litigants are forced to initiate another POOJA SHARMA 2026.05.29 15:34 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document COCP-2279-2026 round of litigation by filing contempt petitions. These petitions not only clog 

https://niyam.ai/judgements/high-court/2026/may/baljinder-kumar-vs-vishram-kumar-meena-ias-dc-and-another