# ASHA GAUTAM vs EMPLOYEES PROVIDENT FUND ORGANISATION AND ORS

Court: Punjab and Haryana High Court
Date: 2026-05-29
Citation: CWP 18368/2026
Petitioner: ASHA GAUTAM
Respondent: EMPLOYEES PROVIDENT FUND ORGANISATION AND ORS

[Official PDF on Punjab and Haryana High Court website](https://livedb9010.phhc.gov.in/public/judgments/order-pdf?case_type=CWP&case_no=18368&case_year=2026&order_date=2026-05-29&order_type=FINAL)

## Judgment text (excerpt)

166 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP-18368-2026 Date of decision: 29.05.2026 Asha Gautam ....Petitioner Versus Employees Provident Fund Organisation and others ...Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARPREET SINGH BRAR Present: Mr. Abhijeet Singh Rawaley, Advocate for the petitioner. HARPREET SINGH BRAR, J. (ORAL) 1. The present civil writ petition has been filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuance of a writ in the nature of mandamus directing respondents No.1 & 2 to consider and accept joint option submitted by the petitioner and respondent No.3 i.e. Punjab Scheduled Castes Land Development & Finance Corporation in accordance with law. Further, directing respondents No.1 & 2 to extend the timeline prescribed in demand notice/letter dated 25.04.2019 (Annexure P-6) on such terms and conditions and also to pay all arrears along with interest @ 18% per annum. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner inter alia contends that the petitioner retired from service of respondent No.3 on 30.11.2011 and at the time of retirement, the pension fixed on the basis of wage-ceilings. He further refers to Annexure P-6 and submits that on the basis of 

https://niyam.ai/judgements/high-court/2026/may/asha-gautam-vs-employees-provident-fund-organisation-and-ors