# ANSH ANIL KAUSHIK @ ANSH KAUSHIK vs STATE OF HARYANA

Court: Punjab and Haryana High Court
Date: 2026-05-21
Citation: CRM-M 13148/2026
Petitioner: ANSH ANIL KAUSHIK @ ANSH KAUSHIK
Respondent: STATE OF HARYANA

[Official PDF on Punjab and Haryana High Court website](https://livedb9010.phhc.gov.in/public/judgments/order-pdf?case_type=CRM-M&case_no=13148&case_year=2026&order_date=2026-05-21&order_type=FINAL)

## Judgment text (excerpt)

1 GAURAV THAKUR 2026.05.21 19:26 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document 2 A perusal of record shows that in the present case, following are the relevant factors which are required to be taken into consideration for a decision:- the petitioner has already joined the investigation; ii. that as laid down by the Hon’ble Supreme Court of India in the case of ‘Vinay Kumar Gupta v. State of Madhya Pradesh’ [Criminal Appeal No.939 of 2026, decided on 16.02.2026], the petitioner cannot be forced to assist the prosecuting agency for the recovery of incriminating material, which may harm his interests or may amount to defeating his right of defence; iii. that as per law laid down by the Hon’ble Supreme Court of India in the case of ‘Sanjay Sharma v. State of Haryana’ [Criminal Appeal No.767 of 2026, decided on 09.02.2026], GAURAV THAKUR 2026.05.21 19:26 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document 3 collection of evidence is the responsibility of the Investigating Officer, and that an accused cannot be compelled to self-incriminate himself; and the fact that the petitioner has already joined the investigation, it is hereby ordered that the petitioner is entitled to

https://niyam.ai/judgements/high-court/2026/may/ansh-anil-kaushik-ansh-kaushik-vs-state-of-haryana