# ANILKUMAR vs STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS

Court: Punjab and Haryana High Court
Date: 2026-05-27
Citation: CWP 17042/2026
Petitioner: ANILKUMAR
Respondent: STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS

[Official PDF on Punjab and Haryana High Court website](https://livedb9010.phhc.gov.in/public/judgments/order-pdf?case_type=CWP&case_no=17042&case_year=2026&order_date=2026-05-27&order_type=FINAL)

## Judgment text (excerpt)

2026:PHHC:084386 Beteaees pete 127 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP-17042-2026 DECIDED ON: 27.05.2026 ANIL KUMAR ....-PETITIONER(S) VERSUS STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS ..-RESPONDENT(S) CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP MOUDGIL Present: Mr. Parveen Moudgil, Advocate for the petitioner(s) SANDEEP MOUDGIL, J (ORAL) 1. The jurisdiction of this Court has been invoked under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for directing the respondents to grant the benefits of re- exercise of option under HCS (ACP) RULE 2016 in view of letter dated 16.06.2017 Annexure P-2 and letter dated 08.06.2020 Annexure P-3. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he will be satisfied in case a direction be issued to the respondent/State to decide the legal notice dated 03.05.2026 (Annexure P-4). 3. Notice of motion. 4, Ms. Mayuri Lakhanpal Kalia, DAG Haryana, having served with an advance copy of the petition, has put in appearance on behalf of respondent/State and assures the Court that the above-said legal notice will be decided within time bound manner. MEENU 2026.06.01 13:36 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CWP-17042-2026 -2- 5. Without advertin

https://niyam.ai/judgements/high-court/2026/may/anilkumar-vs-state-of-haryana-and-others