# ANIL KABOTRA vs CHANDIGARH ADMINISTRATION & ORS.

Court: Punjab and Haryana High Court
Date: 2026-05-25
Citation: CWP 8671/2016
Petitioner: ANIL KABOTRA
Respondent: CHANDIGARH ADMINISTRATION & ORS.

[Official PDF on Punjab and Haryana High Court website](https://livedb9010.phhc.gov.in/public/judgments/order-pdf?case_type=CWP&case_no=8671&case_year=2016&order_date=2026-05-25&order_type=FINAL)

## Judgment text (excerpt)

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 204 CWP-8671-2016 Date of Decision:- 25.05.2026 ANIL KABOTRA ....Petitioner(s) Versus CHANDIGARH ADMINISTRATION & ORS. ...Respondent(s) CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SHEEL NAGU, CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJIV BERRY Present: Mr. Pawan Sharda, Advocate (arguing counsel) Mr. Karanbir Singh, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Sumeet Jain, Additional Standing counsel (arguing counsel) Mr. Himanshu Arora, Advocate for U.T. Chandigarh. Mr. Piyush Khanna, Advocate for respondent No.2. Mr. Anand Chhibbar, Sr. Advocate (arguing counsel) Mr. Shaurya Khanna, Advocate, Ms. Ateev Raj Sandhu, Advocate for respondent No.3 to 5. **** SANJIV BERRY, J. 1. The present writ petition has been filed under Articles 226/227 of the Constitution of India in the form of Public Interest Litigation, claiming the petitioner to be a public-spirited person, seeking writ in the nature of mandamus directing respondent No.1 and 2 to take appropriate action against respondent No.3 for allegedly flouting the provisions of Companies Act, 1956, as well as the terms and conditions of the lease deed SANDAL SHARMA 2026.05.29 16:57 I attest to the accuracy and authenti

https://niyam.ai/judgements/high-court/2026/may/anil-kabotra-vs-chandigarh-administration-ors